Tuesday, May 20, 2014

Your Excellency: It is Time For Change?

Your Excellency:

The plan for the international government is progressing quickly through open debate, but instead of making the steps to bring it about, like a ship that is stopped in the water, and turned the opposite direction from its home port, there must be correction and impetus, or power—I hesitate to use the word power—to bring it about to get it back on course.

Power has connotations of wielding a force to propel one on toward his or her goal, or that of a nation, but the definition of power, and where it comes from, is oftentimes misunderstood. People equate ideas, such as money and power, and once the money is gone, there appears to be no power. Money can purchase items, and having it enables an individual to progress forward toward one’s goal, but it is win-win agreements, not money, that enable forward progress. It benefits the seller and the buyer, and so it is an agreement, but to procure necessary items is not the only criteria for getting ahead.

Nations that have cash-flow crises are oftentimes resource-ful. They become “bank accounts” for the industrialized nations, and thus were targets during the colonization period. This concept has turned the proverbial ocean-liner around, and those who, like the passengers on the Titanic, ran into obstacles, lost their lives and their fortunes. Under the Law of karma—Cause and Effect—whatsoever you do to another will be done to you. It is not a matter of punishment, but of belief that you come from a sense of lack, and continue to reinstate that lack, like a grab for power demonstrates the player suffers from the fear of lack of power.

How this applies internationally is that the entire structure based on games of one-upmanship are terminating due to power grabs, and must be turned around to the desired goal of abundance for all. You can see there must be changes in belief structures associated with this so no more power grabs are initiated. The solution is to find markets for one’s own resources first rather than the emphasis on making trade agreements with third world nations that are suffering from a lack of opportunity to sell their own goods and services.

The change of belief structures is a thought process that progresses from the question of whether change is necessary and desirable to “mopping up” the details once the question is answered affirmatively. For example, is world peace necessary and desirable?

Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes,

Copy: Senator Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), Congressman Peter DeFazio (D-Oregon)

Thursday, May 15, 2014

Your Excellency: How To Overcome The Lies

May 10, 2014

To the diplomatic community in Washington, DC

Your Excellency:

Our organization works for the creation of an international government based on two proven concepts. The political foundation is the U.S. Constitution, and the economic is the cooperation of nature.

While mankind has relied on power games for centuries to gain power and prestige, the events associated with the Iraq War of 2003 and after turned the crisis into a global fiasco. Once the invasion occurred, it became impossible to quell the insurgency due to denying the terrorists a voice. The plan to withdraw the troops did not address the root cause of the crisis, which was to deny sovereignty to Iraq. A hostile takeover bid combined with character defamation is the impetus for control of natural resources and a foothold in the region where future attacks could be initiated. Imagine the crisis that occurred when it became apparent that the maneuvering in the United Nations was unsuccessful!

In this missive, I intend to address one issue and that is how to overcome the lies that rippled out from the center of the conflict, starting with the assertion that Saddam Hussein harbored a grudge against the United States and intended to attack at any moment. After the weapons inspectors failed to find WMD, it was too late to stop the crises that continued to expand from the central core issue.

To end the lies takes going forward from the point where all stakeholders understand that the present plan is not working and they begin to search for a new plan. That time is imperative to discern because attempts to stop the conflict before that time only lead to resistance, and more ripples of effects. Once all agree that it is time to end the conflict, then a new plan must be found, and that plan must already be in existence, solving the problem.
The plan for the proposed international government seems to be the solution at this time for a growing number of parties (on every level) but not to those who have a plan of their own to offer. These people see the crisis as an opportunity to gain power and prestige. They are playing a power game based on drawing all sides toward them, moderates drawing in extremists from every direction.

In my previous letter, I mentioned the idea of the symbol of the Star of David, and these individuals make up “mainstream” society, not searching for a solution, but they recognize the opportunity when they see it and are grabbing for it. This is their “century to shine.”

Our next endeavor—or call to action—is to open debate on every possible plan that can be introduced.

Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes,

Copy: Senator Ron Wyden (D. Oregon), Congressman Peter DeFazio (D. Oregon)