Monday, July 24, 2017

What does it take to be part of the framework?

Today I was asked to explain what it takes to be part of the plan for world peace. The simple answer is, you have to give up the power games.

Imagine the world leaders coming together to open formal discussions on the plan to create the international government, but instead of sitting down and talking, they rattle their proverbial sabers. They have played power games for as long as mankind walked on the planet, but they have reached their ultimate conclusion, and now no longer work. The games stop working when played on an innocent person, and the fact that no WMD were found means that Saddam Hussein was innocent of the charges against him.

Therefore, George W. Bush has faced the backlashes of Universal Law from his power games to preemptively strike Iraq and to topple Saddam Hussein, and now he is very likely open to the plan, which allows him to regain the power he lost by grabbing for power.

This is the lesson mankind is learning now. By denying the Iraqi people their unalienable rights, we Americans lose our rights.

The first crisis then is that disputes between nations will be resolved in court rather than the battlefield, and its contingency is that the United States amend the US Constitution to enable every person on the planet to have their unalienable rights.

Mankind is being lifted to a very high level in our evolution when disputes between nations will be resolved in court, and the monies wasted on war will go to the people.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Breaking Apart the Illusion

Two of the power games governments play--genocides and slavery-- are based on weaving an illusion. Campaign promises sound great, but how many times have the people been disappointed? What about people who live under oppressive regimes, where human rights violations occur daily, and the nation's resources are plundered? These are all the result of the five power games associated with revenge.

When the lies logjam, they seem to create an impenetrable wall of darkness, and it seems there is no way around or through it. Like Moses, he might have been able to make his way around the influence of the Pharaoh, but what about all those who had been enslaved?

There is always a backlash to the games, and the games end when an innocent person has been sacrificed, but the impenetrable wall is blasted apart by Universal Law.

People know oppression when they see it.

Today, let's unify the entire planet by saying, everyone plays the games, and that the games are bad, not the people. People who are grabbing for power will eventually lose it, and that people know oppression when they see it.

The legal system of the international government will be based on Universal Law, so this is a lesson mankind is learning. We know what we don't want, and now it is time to decide what we do want. We know we don't want Sharia law to be the law of the entire planet, or even US federal law. The only law that everyone will agree to is Universal Law, and that creates a sense of equality. It stands on all the principles--equality, liberty, freedom, compassion, abundance, capacity and tolerance.

Thursday, July 13, 2017

Dragged into a Crisis

President Trump and his family and administration are facing investigations over collusion by the Russian government, and today, I would like to look at this from the perspective of the three levels of the US legal system, and why by leaving out Universal law, the United States is falling into crisis. By putting Universal Law back into the resolution of the crisis, the illusion is destroyed.

Donald Trump and his family have had business relations with the Russians, so for them, it has been a small step to include the Russians--their friends--in their present circumstances, and this is something George W. Bush had with the al Saud family and the other Middle Eastern oil-producing royal families. Trump's presidency allows their friends and business associates to function on a higher level. For Donald Trump, it has been like walking along and his goal has been a door, and on the other side of the door is the life he has always dreamed of.

The problem is that he opened the door, and on the other side was a Brick Wall rather than his dream.

The Brick Wall is actually his end of life crisis. He is 180 degrees from where he thinks he is, but unless someone gets him turned around and back on track, he won't survive this, and this occurs every time someone hits the point of the Brick Wall. If he he goes to court and loses his case, his brand is worthless, and he stands to lose everything he has. His worse nightmare has come to pass. He becomes what he has feared--a failure.

By relying on power games, Donald Trump is now facing the ultimate conclusion of the games--the backlashes from Universal Law.

The US Constitution has the Emoluments Clause to prevent foreign governments from influencing or taking over the United States, and now Congress is trying to decide how to treat these infractions. Are they High Crimes and Misdemeanors? What about the schism between the Republicans and the Democrats? Will this tear apart our country? Is he breaking federal law? Is this a valid election?

The Universe has three levels--the Principles, the Power and the Project. The US legal system has three levels, also--Universal Law, Constitutional Law and Federal Law. If you leave out the Principles--Equality, Liberty, Freedom, Compassion, Abundance, Capacity and Tolerance-- you have only Power and Project.  The Constitution is evolutionary. It can evolve or devolve based on the power games that are played, like stacking the Supreme Court with ultra-Conservative justices with the intent to sway the court to support Big Business, and the federal laws are written that deny Americans our unalienable rights.

If you are raising a child, to teach the child about Universal law, you say, "do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Always treat people the way you would like to be treated.

Now, let's step back and consider whether the United States is standing on the principles of Universal Law. We can use it as a tool or a punishment. If we stand on all seven principles, we are unbeatable. If we are not, we will face the backlashes of Universal law.

By toppling Saddam Hussein, we invaded a sovereign nation. The Iraqi people have their right to chose their own leadership. They were created by the same Creator as the rest of the planet, with their unalienable rights, also. By denying them their rights, we are facing the loss of our unalienable rights.

During the end of life crisis, you are in circular thinking patterns, that you must do something, but you don't know what to do, but you must do something... The solution to every dilemma is to do what is in everyone's best interest. That is the basis for Universal law. To leave one person out, you leave yourselves out.

If Donald Trump wants to enable himself, his family and friends and business associates to function on a higher level, he must allow everyone to function on a higher level. He can work with all the world leaders to support the plan for the international government, which will guarantee to every person on the planet their unalienable rights.

Donald, you cannot get the life you want by playing power games. You cannot break the emolument clause, or federal law. There is always a backlash to the games.  

Wednesday, July 5, 2017

Purifying the US Legal System

One of our organization's exempt purposes is to purify the US legal system. The first step is to re-introduce Universal Law as the basis for our legal system so that it can become the basis for the international legal system. For world peace to come, every person on the planet had to be exposed to Universal Law.

Not all people live according to Universal Law. People all over the world go about their lives with no regard for human rights. Crimes are being perpetrated and justified by people who have no social conscience, and on every level. The Iraq War was an act of revenge, which is based on five power games, including war, genocide, massacres based on greed, slavery and terrorism. Two are based on weaving an illusion--genocide and slavery--so imagine that there are more and more of these deplorable crimes being committed every day, in every nations, and they seem to be justified acts to the perpetrators.  

The US legal system has basic premises, and one is that someone is presumed innocent until proven guilty. That is because you cannot defend yourself from prejudice and ulterior motives. The rise of heinous crimes comes about because how can children, for example, defend themselves at all? It is up to the courts to defend you, but our nation's legal system went off course when the perspective of our government was limited to two levels--constitutional law and federal law. 

The Universe has three levels--Universal Law, constitutional law and federal law. The levels are known as Principles, Power and Project, or Father, Mother and Son. By limiting the perspective to two levels--Power and Project, our legal system started to become chaotic and contradictory. 

I have been sending in briefs to attorneys* who are taking our presidents, past and present, to court for unconstitutional executive orders and foreign policies, starting with Saleh v. Bush, in which an Iraqi woman is taking George W. Bush to court to redress grievances that occurred during the Iraq War. This is her constitutional right to do so, even if she is not a citizen of the United States. This is part of the Bill of Rights, and it is there to insure that our government does not become tyrannical to the people. The attorneys who are defending the presidents are relying on constitutional laws and federal laws, but omitting Universal Law of Cause and Effect. 

No one has the right to invade a sovereign nation, and to topple their government. While it may seem to be in the best interests of the United States, and even a matter of security, and it may even be appear to be constitutional to do that, it goes against Universal Law and there will be backlashes to that power game, and that is proven by the Iraq War. 

No one has the right, under Universal Law, to take away the rights of another person, no matter how old or their race or religion. If you do, you lose your own rights, which are granted to each of us by our Creator and guaranteed to us by the Constitution. While the Iraq War seemed to be justified, and the preemptive strike has become a policy that may be used again, it is an unlawful act under Universal Law--and constitutional law and federal law. 

I have started a new blog to address Purifying the US Legal System.

*I have sent in the briefs, but it is up to the attorneys to decide whether to use them in court. As the principal of the organization whose exempt purpose is to purify the US legal system, I have the right to offer a brief and to function as an expert witness in court.