Friday, April 29, 2016

The Elephant in the Room

Don't look now but there is an elephant in the room. It is huge and it won't go away until everyone recognizes that it is there.

I know no one wants to see that elephant in the room, but elephants are notorious for being hard to sweep under the proverbial rug. I am pointing it out because I want world peace to come, and for world peace to come, the elephant must go.

The proverbial elephant in the room is the issue that there were no WMD found in Iraq, and therefore, Saddam Hussein was considered innocent of the charges against him.

I understand that for some people, recognizing that elephant will be difficult, because they will have to assume responsibility for their role in inviting the elephant into the room, but ripples of effects have gone out from the character defamation campaign against Saddam Hussein, and they have affected every person on the planet. This is an issue that should be resolved in court rather than the battlefield, it must be addressed to stop the ripples. Character defamation is an individual form of genocide, and the knee-jerk reaction that stops a war makes a genocide worse, so unless this issue is recognized, the crisis will continue to get worse.

Our Exit Strategy for Iraq proposal allows mankind to recognize the crisis and work together to end it. We are looking at what triggered the crisis, the power games related to revenge and how revenge works and why it doesn't work. Where true power comes from. How to overcome the effects of the crisis. We are creating a protocol that prevents this global from occurring again.

The existing structure has proven it cannot end or prevent wars and global genocides. Our goal is the creation of an international court system based on the creation of an international government so that disputes between nations are resolved in court rather than the battlefield. The monies now wasted on war will go to support the people instead and help to end poverty, and hopefully trigger a global renaissance. It will also save a lot of lives.

For the next month, we are going to look at the Exit Strategy for Iraq, and how to undo the damage that has been done.

Karen Holmes,

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Building the Foundation for the International Government

Creating an international government is a huge endeavor, like building a skyscraper, and mankind must start to build the foundation for it, one block at a time. Imagine that the idea has been introduced and everyone agrees to the plan, and the proposals are now like the pile of blocks at the construction site. It takes someone with experience to set the blocks into place. This is the role our organization plays. We represent the architects.

The first block sets the future building in a particular place and orientation. Mankind exists in a continuum of frequency, and can function on a very high level or low. For the plan to succeed, it must function on a very high level.  Our goal is that the international government will last one thousand years, and mankind must evolve out of it. 

Power games are very low frequency, and, generally speaking, the world leaders rose to the level of power they did by playing power games. The games are oppressive to the people. 

The first issue we are addressing is where true power comes from. If the world leaders come together to create the international government at our conference, will they jockey for power by taking their games to the lower level, or will they be statesmen and stateswomen and work  together diligently to address what must be addressed during the first conference? 

It will take the next twenty years to create the international government. The first issue we address enables the creation on an international court system based on the plan so that disputes between nations are resolved in court rather than the  battlefield, and the monies now wasted on war will go to support the people, instead.

As Confucius would say, "The longest journey starts with one step." 

Let's get started. 

Our Proposal to North and South Korea

Your Excellency,

Our organization is working to introduce a plan for an international government, and included in our first eight proposals is one for North and South Korea. We have offered you our proposal and opened it to debate, but before it can come about, everyone must understand that creating the international government is like building the foundation of a very large building, and the contingency for each is that the previous proposal is accepted.

Mankind is evolving, and overcoming one issue at a time. We understand that Kim Jong Un uses his missiles now to defend himself from any sign of aggression. The first issue relates to where true power comes from. Acts of revenge and aggression do not end conflicts. You can’t bring peace by going to war.

We ask that you—and North Korea—turn you attentions to our first proposal—An Exit Strategy for Iraq-- and join the debate on it and the topic of where true power comes from.

The international government will be based on the U.S. Constitution, so disputes between nations will be resolved in an international court rather than the battlefield, just as disputes between states. The monies now wasted on war will go to support the people. North Korea faces a continual humanitarian crisis from lack of food. By supporting this first step, North Korea can solve their own food shortages.

The executive summaries of all our proposals and associated projects and events can be found at

Your for peace,

Karen Holmes,
The World Peace Organization for the One World Government

For updates on our progress in creating the World Peace Plan, please go to

Friday, April 22, 2016

Letter to U.S. Department of State on Earth Day

The environment affects every person on the planet, and therefore it must be under the auspices of an international government. The crisis is that there is no institution that is without its faults, which drags politics into the crisis and prevents crises from being resolved.

The solution is the creation of an international government based on the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature. Nature is based on making win-win agreements, and if the international government is too, we become a part of nature rather than fighting it through power games of one-upmanship.

The international government that is being proposed will have eleven departments, including Departments of the Environment, Oceans, Interior, Natural Resources and Agriculture, all working to keep our planet in a pristine condition.

As of today, people in 84 nations support the creation of such an international government, so it is a viable alternative to existing institutions, such as the United Nations.

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Walk the Rainbow

The plan for the international government has been introduced, and many people see it as the solution, but how to create it is the question.

The first eight proposals have been introduced and opened to debate, but before they will be accepted, everyone must understand the principles and the application of the principles, and take the steps of the planning process.

To create the plan for the international government, mankind must Walk the Rainbow.

The first step of the long journey to world peace is not to come together at a summit to hash out the details of the plan. Many people still rely on the old structure, which is based on games of one-manship. Imagine that the vast majority of people are still relying on the games, and only two people on the planet see the potential of the plan to bring world peace. The others see the plan as their grand opportunity to get their life on a higher level, and are jockeying for power, or are too busy dealing with their own issues to pay any attention.

People must be squeezed to participate, and the squeezing action comes when they realize the games they have played don't work anymore. They face the backlashes from the games.

This occurred within the United States with the preemptive strike on Iraq. George W. Bush played the regime change game, which to that point seemed to work, but because it was played on an innocent man--there were  no WMD, so Saddam Hussein was attempting to comply with U.N. sanctions--the games backlashed, and the preemptive strike was perceived as a power grab, and instead of gaining power, prestige and control of natural resources, he started a civil war, and ripples of effects went out from the conflict to draw in every person on the planet.

Many people still think the United States was justified in toppling Saddam Hussein. This created a schism between nations and within nations. This time period is known as Armageddon. When one person stands on the principles, it threatens the security and support of those who rely on that person, and they do down through a series of battles, known as the Battles of Armageddon. When the battles occur within a family, it tears apart the marriage. When the two people are leaders of sovereign nations, Armageddon tears apart the planet.

Each side's perspective is valid, but to end the conflict, a new plan must unify people again and address conflict resolution. That new plan must enable everyone to get the life they want, including their financial support and security.

This is not that difficult to understand. Compare the process to overcoming alcoholism or drug addiction. Many successful results are based on 12-step programs. On The Rainbow's catalog is the same process, but it is 22 steps and they carry the person in crisis all the way to the point where he or she is not only out of the crisis, but creating the life he or she wants--which is something that alcohol and drugs cannot do. Relying on them to get the life one wants leads to crisis.

This is very difficult to understand. Compare being an alcoholic or drug addict and taking the long journey out of the abyss. Every person on the planet plays the power games, and every person on the planet will be Walking the Rainbow for many years.

One idea at a time must permeate the collective consciousness of mankind; the ideas must go viral. The solution is not social media, which doesn't expect anyone to change his or her belief structures or behavior, but the books--channeled messages on how to overcome any crisis.

Each proposal has one page of On The Rainbow's catalog. The first proposal is the Exit Strategy for Iraq, which leads to the creation of an international court system so that disputes between nations are resolved in a legitimate court system based on Universal Law. At this time, every person on the planet has been exposed to Universal Law. To base it on any other concept--such as Sharia Law, or even the U.S. legal system--will only lead to oppressive power games and protest.

Before the U.S. Constitution will be accepted as the basis for the international government, certain practices that have created chaos in the system must be addressed, and that includes foreign policy decisions, such as regime change. The U.S. legal system must be purified to prevent the chaos from spreading onto the international level.  Power games no longer work.

While each individual Walks the Rainbow to overcome the effects of the games, the nations will, too.

Karen Holmes,

Sunday, April 3, 2016

Postcards are all inclusive to ensure highest end result

Letters are addressed to the ambassadors in Washington, DC, and each month new ambassadors are posted. The plan for the international government doesn't always trickle down to the embassy staff. They attend parties, too, and are just as likely to talk about events that interest everyone, including speculation about the creation of the international government.

The solution to get everyone in the Washington, DC diplomatic community involved in the debate is our Track Our Progress postcards.

Our website gives our organization an online presence, but our blogs give constant updates. By just looking at our website, it gives the appearance that we are making very little progress. That is not the case at all. The plan is huge, and expect it to evolve over the next twenty years--slowly and in perfect order.

The Track Our Progress postcards announce two blogs, this one for updates on the international government, and the Track Our Progress blog allows us to tell the story within our organization so the ambassadors can understand how to apply what we are doing on the international level--or to not do what we are doing because they see what is occurring from their wider perspective.

The same thing will occur as the international government evolves. The plan is based on the U.S. Constitution, so we Americans have a real "feel" for how the international government will work. People from other nations don't have a true picture of how our government functions, and probably make assumptions that are not true. When the idea is debated, America can talk about how we have done it in the past, but then others will take the idea higher by adding new perspectives, overcoming our shortfalls. With everyone on the planet involved in the debate, we have an international government that has the potential to last a thousand years. Mankind must evolve out of it.

The widest perspective possible is what we are hoping to achieve with the creation of the international government, and that includes perspectives that one would not normally include. Our proposals and books are channeled by entities like the spiritual hierarchy--by God, the Creator of us all-- and the past kings, queens and presidents of different nations, and they will return to speak from their own experience to ensure that the international government functions on the highest level possible. Don't be surprised at who shows up in the debate.