Saturday, October 31, 2015

Dear President Obama: Degrading ISIS


My organization would like to offer a new perspective on how to deal with ISIS, rather than attempting to degrade them by military or even advisory actions.

In the past, I told you that crises occur on every level, and it is possible to demonstrate the solution on the individual level and then apply the same solution on the international level. My organization is parallel to the international government, and we are facing the same crises. We have our proposals that are the solutions for the first eight nations, and all fell into crisis due to a sense of judgment, including the Unites States.

The judgment of Saddam Hussein as evil triggered a global genocide. Perpetrators of genocides weave a sense of illusion. You won't be able to unravel the illusion. You don't know who to trust.

The "caliph" will twist and turn everything to his own advantage, and has been doing it a long time.  He is attempting to prevent the plan from coming about. You cannot trust anyone, nor can you understand where people are in their understanding, because they have no way to gauge the truth, or are being pressured to not tell the truth, or fear for their lives or the lives of their loved ones.

The last stage of the genocide, the perpetrators believe they have been victimized and they attempt to negotiate for what they hoped to gain, but it is in no one's best interest, and it is unlawful for them to have it. They are fighting for their life because they equate what they hoped to gain with their life.

The Grand Lie was told to justify the preemptive strike on Iraq, and ripples of effects have gone out. The US legal system is based on presumption of innocence because you cannot defend yourself from prejudice and ulterior motives.

The solution to every dilemma is to do what is in everyone's best interest.

ISIS is part of the hostile takeover of the planet, perpetrated by people who have perfected the games within their own nations, and this is how they remain in power. They justify their actions with old prophecies about the end times, but that is half truths made to look like full truths, and the people are drawn into the obfuscation.

Mankind has three choices now. We can rely on the UN, which has proven it cannot end or prevent wars. The caliphate is another option. The third, unseen choice, is the creation of the international government. This is part of the prophecy, but it is in no one's best interest for the caliphate to come about.

As the president of the United States, it is not your responsibility to undermine ISIS. Our nation separate Church and State. My organization is working to unify the religions, and this ultimately undermines ISIS. Rather than to defend Islam, they are undermining their own religion and will become more and more illogical.

Each of the seven spiritual teachers, including The Prophet Muhammad, taught one segment of the body of knowledge necessary to create the life you want. Each of the religions also plays one favorite power game. Christians wage war, Muslims resort to terrorism, and Jews, when they believe they are victimized, trigger genocides.

The international government will guarantee the rights of the people to leave a nation if the people believe they are being oppressed. Because a nation's power is based on population within the international House of Representatives, if a government is too oppressive, they will lose power on the international government if their people start leaving.  The international government will have offices in the same buildings--churches-- with  clerics from all seven of the major religions, and they will teach the people how to create the life they want based on the principles of their religions.

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Dear President Bush: (message continued)



(This is a continuation of a message that I sent through your website form for scheduling requests.)

The events associated with Oxford and Stonehenge help to stop the fighting, but ending the conflict requires both sides to be seen as equal.


The next step involves mediation, to be hosted by Saudi Arabia. Both sides will be able to present aruments. My organization will handle the mediation, and during the week-long event, we will all work to set up the first local court in another nation to handle a court case between President Bush and Saddam Hussein's lieutenant, just as if the dispute had gone to court during the era of the proposed international government.

Both sides will have one year to prepare their cases, and during that time period, my organization will work with the nation to set up the court system.

The final step will be for President Bush and the Iraqi lieutenant to come to the conference of world leaders in Europe as advocates of the proposed international government's court system to help set up the Judicial Branch of the international government.

My organization will do our best to treat all participants as fairly and equitably as possible.
The events at Oxford will address unification, and those at Stonehenge will address conflict resolution. We will offer innovative insights that will allow the entire planet to evolve. Our Exit Strategy for Iraq is a US economic stimulus plan that plugs the drain on the US economy to the Middle East.

I have contact President Obama and Ambassador Sir Peter Westmacott on this proposal, and opened it for debate. I recommend you speak with President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry about this plan, and if everyone agrees that it is in your best interests, to then contact me and my organization.

The executive summary of the proposal can be found at http://www.oneworldgov.org.

Karen Holmes
Principal
The World Peace Organization for the One World Government
principal@oneworldgov.org
www.oneworldgov.org
For updates on the plan for the international government, please go to www.worldpeaceplan.info

Dear President Bush: Our invitation to Oxford and Stonehenge


Our organization is submitting a proposal with the capacity to end the conflict in Iraq. It leads to the creation of an international court system so that disputes between nations are resolved in court rather than the battlefield.

Our plan allows President Bush and Tony Blair to extricate themselves from the conflict gracefully, by doing what is in everyone's best interest.

Our plan is to bring together President Bush and one of Saddam Hussein's lieutenants as if they were two kings going to Stonehenge for an ancient rite of conflict resolution. England will host the event. The two men will be feasted at Durrington Walls, then on the morning of the equinox, they will march to Stonehenge for the rite, a yelling match, basically  between the soldiers. The recent archeological evidence support our theory that Stonehenge was used for conflict resolution. (Limited space. More to come.)

Proposal can be found at http:.//www.oneworldgov.org.

Dear President Obama: Don't Send in the Troops!


As of today, people in 81 nations support the plan for the international government.

Today's news reports a change in policy that puts our troops into harm's way by escalating the role our military plays in the Middle East, from advisors to combat.

The conflict devolved as a genocide, not a war, and the knee-jerk reaction that ends a war makes a genocide worse. Escalation into combat roles puts our nation into a global conflict that we cannot win.

I can speak from experience. My organization is parallel to the proposed international government and we are experiencing a genocide amongst our potential members, and attempts to fight the genocidaires has led to the deaths of thousands of people in California, including the deaths of many children.

I was not allowed to have any contact with the man who was supposed to work with me. If we had worked together, the conflict would have ended prior to the deaths of civiliians in California.

I strongly urge the US government not to fall into the same trap the potential members of my organization fell into, attempting to fight, but rather I urge our government to do what is in everyone's best interest.

What stops a genocide is to defend the person who is being defamed, and that is Saddam Hussein.

The solution is diplomatic, not miliary. There are sleeper cells in every nation on the planet, including our allies, so by attempting to draw in our allies, the sleeper cell rises and you undermine the security of the allies.

You do not know who to trust. Tony Blair made comments recently that he was sorry for the mistakes he made, but he does not understand the principles behind his mistakes. It is as if he failed at invading a sovereign nation because, in his thinking, everyone knows that Saddam Hussein was evil. No one has the right to judge another person as being evil.

The illusion is very strong now, and you have no idea who to trust. Our government relied on regime change by covert and overt actions, and now we are being toppled by covert and overt actions.

The character defamation campaign against Saddam Hussein was an act of revenge, and to undo the conflict starts with George HW Bush. He is the  one who can undermine the terrorists by understanding that his actions against Saddam Hussein, who was protesting Kuwait's  slant drilling into Iraq, made many people in the Middle East very angry.

Jeb Bush is losing support for his presidential campaign because he doesn't understand the wider perspective. Now is the right time to draw the Bush family into the process so they can overcome the backlashes that are arising from their failed foreign policy.

The solution is to do what is in everyone's best interest, and that is to draw the Bush family into the Exit Strategy for Iraq proposal.

Dear President Obama: Our first focus is on the United States


As of today, people in 81 nations support the plan for the international government.

I have told you that the plan must come from the people, when the people are ready, not from world leaders. Change must come from within the culture or there is resistance, and this is one reason that the Iraqi government instated by the United States is not able to keep peace.

Each nation must be willing to make the changes necessary to fit into the new structure. Our Constitution must be amended to create the additional layer of government, and it is a structural change so we recommend an Article V convention, which is the closest way to how our founding fathers functioned.

Our organization must explain how the plan benefits everyone, and this will come through a series of books and projects and events, starting with bringing together a professional publishing team, and that team will be made up of specific people.

People are being squeezed to come in when their own agenda fails.

The United States does not have to participate in the plan for the international government. If the amendment does not make it through the process, the plan will be introduced in a modified form through another country.

If we look at the idea that we in America will vote on participation, and we must understand what we are voting on, and it is a long process, it allows others to step back and to watch the process. They will take things higher than we do because they have a broader perspective. "This is how it will function, but we can evolve."

The first proposal is the Exit Strategy for Iraq, and that allows the US to extricate ourselves gracefully from the conflict in Iraq. It allows George W. Bush and Tony Blair to undo the damage they have done and regain the power they lost, and to understand what they did and why it didn't work.

It sets the stage for disputes between nations to be resolved in a court system rather than the battlefield, and the monies now wasted on war to go to the people instead. It is based on Universal Law, the basis for the international legal system. It allows mankind to evolve.

The genocide that came from the lie to justify the war created a sense of illusion, and to overcome the illusion, we must look at what we want for our future and what we don't want. We are opening a dialogue to see people's intent. The truth will come out.

This is where it starts. One step at a time.



Monday, October 26, 2015

Dear President Obama: The power games no longer work.


As of today, people in 81 nations support the plan for the international government.

There are seven games people play, compensatory games based on a sense of lack. Governments play five of the games, and all five together make up acts of revenge. In the past, I told you George HW Bush, believing he had the right to put Saddam Hussein down,  went to war -- the Gulf War-- and set the stage for the act of genocide based on judgment that Saddam Hussein was evil. That brought in the Coalition who came for lucrative contracts based on the game of Greed, and that brought in the governments that rely strongly on US aid to fight the war on terror, and they brought in the terrorists. All are acts of revenge, all based on misunderstandings, and all are undermining each other.

Saddam Hussein was attempting to comply with UN sanctions, and because the power games continue on until an innocent person is crucified, it backlashed on George W. Bush and collapsed the US power base. The games no longer work.

The United States has relied on regime change to gain control of natural resources and strategic locations. That game no longer works. There will always be an immediate backlash to that game.

True power does not come from a strong military, it comes from assuming responsibility to undo the damage you have done.

Genocides are based on weaving an illusion. They are based on judgment,
and each of the eight nations that have our proposals fell into crisis due to a sense of judgment. They include the United States, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, the DRCongo, North Korea, and Cyprus.

The legal system of the international government will be based on Universal Law, something that applies to all people and everyone has been exposed to. "Do unto others as you would have them do to you."

Tony Blair said yesterday he made mistakes, but he believed it was right to remove Saddam Hussein from office. How would he feel if the tables were turned?

Tony Blair believes he has the right to judge Saddam Hussein, but the Iraqi people have the right to choose their own leadership.  They chose a dictatorship as their form of government, and dictators rule by force.

The solution to every crisis--particularly in the Middle East--is to do what is in everyone's best interest. In the case of the Middle East, the solution is the international government that allows the people to be exposed to a higher form of government on the international level, and then allow them to evolve into that within their own nation when they are ready to do so.


Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Dear President Obama: The old power games no longer work.


Our organization is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 81 nations support the plan for the international government.

The plan has been opened to debate, and many people like the idea, but don't know how to bring it about. We can't convince anyone to participate. It is up to the United States to make the first step. We are the overview of all the nations, a melting pot of cultures from every nation.

The proposals are lined up in such a way that as we address them, and the planning and projects and events, it starts to build a foundation that draws nations into the process, and they are lined up like dominoes from the widest perspective to the narrowest.

We are taking small steps, when people are ready for them to come. At the same time, there is no resistance when you are doing what is in everyone's best interest. There is fear associated with letting go of the old structure, and people won't see how the plan benefits them.

We bounce back and forth between the narrower and the wider perspective. The first idea is that disputes between nations will be resolved in court rather than the battlefield and the monies now wasted on war will go to support the people instead.

You can see how those who rely on the military or associated industries will fear for their security and support. But eventually it reaches the understanding that putting your financial support ahead of the lives of others won't work. Our plan must offer everyone the chance to create a solid financial foundation, but it can't be based on power games of war and genocide. This is where our projects come in, to enable everyone to function on a higher level, but no one can be sacrificed.

Games of war and genocide and massacres based on greed don't work. There is always a backlash to the games.

Each nation has a right to choose its own leadership. The game of regime change backfired on the United States.  That game will never work again, and will lead to an immediate loss of power for the player of the game.

The games are oppressive to the people, and people are standing in protest. World peace is up to the people, and how we will deal with that within the United States is through a constitutional amendment to create the additional layer of government over what already exists.

My organization is also an overview concept, parallel to the international government, and a grassroots movement for a constitutional amendment is something that we are not allowed to do under the 501 (c)3 code, but as the overview, we can turn responsibility over to an independent member of our organization, and assist them in the amendment process without threatening our nonprofit status. I have yet to be able to bring in that individual who will assume responsibility for the Constitutional Amendment process, which will take everyone in my overview organization  working together to bring it about.

Until that time, we are still dealing with the hostile takeover of the organization in the form of a character defamation campaign, and the parallel of the Exit Strategy for Iraq.

Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes
Principal

Friday, October 23, 2015

Dear President Obama: You can't convince anyone to participate


As of today, people in 81 nations support the plan for the proposed international government.

The plan for the international government has been opened to debate, and many people are aware of it and see it as the solution to the crises we are facing. Not all people see the potential for the plan to benefit them. Only those with the widest perspective can understand how this solves their problems, and the rest are strung along a continuum from the widest perspective to the narrowest. Those who function entirely for their own interests won't see the benefits of participation until it reaches them.

This is why those who would like to be the next superpower or emperor of the planet will continue to play power games, and why you won't be able to convince them to participate.

Our proposals are designed to take the widest issues and resolve them first. The Iraq War triggered a global genocide, and the proposal sets the stage for disputes to be resolved in an international court system rather than the battlefield.

Genocides occur on every level, and at this point, there is no accepted definition of the word, other than ethnic cleansing. Character defamation campaigns are genocides and there are family genocides, too. Many people can understand how difficult it is to deal with genocides on a cultural basis.

Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes,
Principal

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

Letter to the editor:


President Obama is in a very difficult situation. With Muslim sleeper cells in every nation on the planet, he cannot fight the entire planet. A cell can rise at any time and turn that nation into another Syria.

Mankind now has three choices. We can rely on the UN, which has proven it cannot end or prevent wars, and that choice puts us on a slippery slope. We can devolve into a global conflict by playing power games. The third option is to do what is in everyone's best interest, and everyone work together to create a new international structure that functions on a higher level than the existing structure.

The plan for the international government is being debated on the international level. It is a viable option, and the solution to this crisis.

To solve the religious war that is devolving across the planet, the solution is to unify the religions by understanding that each of the seven major religions teaches one segment of the body of knowledge that is necessary to create the life you want. This creates a sense of equality, the first requirement for conflict resolution.


Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes,
Principal
The World Peace Organization for the One World Government

Dear President Obama: You don't have to fight ISIS


Our organization would like to explain how to end the conflict in Iraq and the rise of ISIS and other Muslim extremist organizations.

When George W. Bush justified the preemptive strike on Iraq, he told a Grand Lie that triggered a genocide. The act of judgment against Saddam Hussein is a character defamation campaign and an act of revenge.

His power game backlashed on the United States, and collapsed the US power base. The power games continue on until an innocent person is crucified, and for George W. Bush it was Saddam Hussein. Be careful about attempting to topple Bashar al Assad for the same reason.

The United States has relied on covert and overt actions to topple governments, and now those games are being used on the United States, and many other world leaders. You don't know who your allies are.

As the US dropped in power, other world's leaders started to jockey for power, and each plays a favorite power game. Two games associated with revenge is genocide are slavery and genocide and both weave an illusion. Once the Grand Lie has been told, the truth doesn't overcome the lie. It just reaches the point where no one knows who to trust.

The solution to every dilemma is to do what is in everyone;s best interest. You will discover the plan for the international government is the solution because it is in everyone's best interest, including the extremists. Our Exit Strategy for Iraq ends the conflict in Iraq.

You do not have to fight ISIS, because you can't win. The solution for the rise of the caliphate is being addressed through the Faith of the Pure Ray. It is a new global spiritual concept that is based on the fact that each of the world's seven major religions teaches one segment of the body of knowledge that is necessary to create the life you want.

Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes,
Principal

Friday, October 16, 2015

Dear President Obama


My organization is working to introduce a plan for an international government based on the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 81 nations support the plan for world peace.

With the presidential election coming, the issue of whether the United States will participate in the creation of the international government is becoming apparent. The plan has been opened to debate, and many world's leaders are aware of the plan, but the plan is also competing with the existing structure, which many world's leaders rely on for security and support, and are therefore resistant to change, and with the rise of individual world leaders who sees the present circumstances as his or her opportunity to become supreme leader of the planet.

This time of transition is a difficult one, and what makes it even harder is that those who are angry and resisting change and those who see this as their opportunity to create their life on a higher level are fighting for their lives and weaving an illusion, and don't see the benefits of the plan.

It takes those who see the true potential of the plan to continue to work to bring it about. We must stand on the principles of the plan. The games of one-upmanship that the old structure is based upon can no longer be tolerated. The United States must continue to work toward the creation of the plan for the international government--to make it a reality.

Our Exit Strategy for Iraq proposal has been opened to debate, and is contingent upon the United States working to create the plan for the international government within the United States. Time is short, with the upcoming presidential election and the announcement that the Chilcot Report will be opened to public scrutiny.

I ask that you work with me and my organization to create the plan for the international government.  


Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes
Principal

Friday, October 9, 2015

Dear Congressman DeFazio: The solution to our next crisis.


This is a time of severe crisis for the United States and the entire planet. This is a time when mankind can devolve into a global conflict or work together to bring world peace. The opportunity to function on a higher level exists, but that involves people stepping away from the conflict and doing what is in everyone's best interest.

The preemptive strike on Iraq devolved as a genocide, and genocides are based on weaving an illusion. Issues, such as Syria, are not what they seem. There is an optical illusion effect, a flip flop, and it is hard to see which is which. I would like to explain to you how to overcome the illusion that is being woven.

At a past town hall meeting in Brookings, I asked you to comment on the possibility of China calling in its markers and taking Alaska and the Bakken field in North Dakota. Your response was that Congress knows that is possible, and it is even worse because China manufactures necessary parts for our weapons systems.

The crisis is even worse than that now because the United States cannot rely on any nation at this time to be an ally. George W. Bush created a coalition of the willing, but the flip flop concept of that is to undermine the coalition nations.  With sleeper cells in every nation, including the 90 nations that receive foreign aid from the United States, those sleeper cells are not inactive, but actively implanting the sense of illusion within the ranks of the existing governments and creating a schism, a hostile takeover bid on the government and the planet.

This is occurring as part of the takeover of the planet, but also as a normal progression of relationships that don't have the same goal, and the natural progression is being manipulated and controlled. An example of the natural schism is with this presidential election, between the parties and within the parties. The schism occurs when one stands on the principles and the other on the power games.

Rather than to fight ISIS, for example, and risk the rise of the sleeper cells and toppling the governments, the solution is to stand on the principles of equality, liberty, freedom, compassion, abundance, capacity, and tolerance. Together, these principles make the United States unbeatable. We don't have to fight ISIS. We can stand on the principles.  These are the principles that our Founding Fathers stood on in the Constitution. They guaranteed to everyone our inalienable rights, which is what people who have been involved in a genocide lack.

Yours for peace,
Karen Holmes,
Principal


Sunday, October 4, 2015

Dear President Obama:


My organization is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 81 nations support the plan for world peace.

Bridging the existing structure to the proposed international government is done one step at a time, and the first step is ending the global genocide that is expanding out from the conflict in Iraq. The preemptive strike went against the premise that someone is presumed innocent until proven guilty. That came about because you cannot defend yourself from prejudice and ulterior motives.

Genocides are based on weaving an illusion, and in the illusion, we are 180 degrees from where we think we are. We are pushing away the people we need and holding onto what we don't need.

George W. Bush drew together a coalition of nations by drawing in his markers, but now we cannot depend on having any allies whatsoever, because the sleeper cells have been established in all the nations who rely on us for foreign aid.

The solution is to do what is in everyone's best interest. What ends of genocide is to defend the person who is being defamed. Saddam Hussein was attempting to comply with UN sanctions, and therefore he was innocent of the charges against him.

Then, for conflict resolution, everyone must be considered equal. With sleeper cells in 90 nations--more likely all the nations--everyone is facing the threat of hostile takeover from within. The way to address that is the exit strategy for Iraq, that disputes between nations will be settled in an international court system rather than the battlefield.

Then, to defend yourself from covert and overt actions, it is to guarantee the same inalienable rights we have as American citizens under our Constitution, so it is to open the plan for the international government to debate, and America will work to amend our constitution, demonstrating to the entire planet that we can treat all people fairly and equally. This is how we democratize the planet.