Monday, February 29, 2016

Dear President Obama: Stand on the principles

In the past, I have asked you to Track Our Progress. That allows you to take what is beneficial and use to it your advantage, or not to fall into the same traps we have fallen into.

Our organization is parallel to the international level, and for the last several years, the plan for world peace has been subverted, and a "shadow" concept has been rising in power. It is the scenario of a horror movie, of an impostor taking control and squeezing out the rightful person. The same thing has occurred on the international level.

A global genocide is spreading across the planet. Genocides are based on weaving an illusion, and you won't be able to unravel the lies that have been told. So many covert and overt actions have occurred that by attempting to stop them you will always be in a reactive mode rather than an active mode.

What people lack when victimized by covert and overt actions is their freedoms. What is missing now from the lives of the people of the planet is their equality, their liberty and now their freedom. The next lack with be compassion, because no one will know how to end the feud that has started, and so people will harden their hearts. Then no one will be wiling to work together, which leads to profound global poverty, and a slave labor mentality will become norm. Please don't make the same mistake the potential independent members of my organization have made, and continue to make by leaving me out of the decision making process.

I am the overview concept that stands on the principles and leaves no one out. Imagine the United States is an overview concept because we are a melting pot. Now think of the principles the caliphate would stand on, in regards to those they deem outside of their religion, or Putin taking over the entire planet. He can rule Russia, but how would American citizens feel about him becoming the emperor of the planet? It is a matter of power games or principles. The games no longer work. The games lead to war, genocide, massacres, slavery, terrorism, famine and poverty.

The plan for the international government was introduced and opened to debate, but by relying on the military to advise you on foreign policy decisions, you relied on the game of war, and started a feud you can't win. By relying on the "shadow" to teach you the principles, you have no solution for ending the global genocide that is unfolding.

The plan for the international government will always be the solution to every crisis.

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Dear Jeb Bush: Power comes from assuming responsibilty

Would you please pass this on to Jeb Bush? It enables him to overcome this crisis of withdrawing from the campaign.

Governor Bush:

This moment in time must be a low point for you and your entire family, but it is in moments such as this that there is also great opportunity. Being president of the United States is a very powerful position, but power comes from assuming responsibility to undo the damage that was done, not from carrying on the family tradition of becoming president of the United States.

The damage I refer to is foreign policy decisions that many US presidents have relied on to gain power and prestige in the world--regime change. It is a power game, and the problem is that there is always a backlash from the games. It just took time for it to hit, and so it seemed like a good plan. The games continued on until an innocent person was toppled. The issue of no WMD is what ended the game of regime change.

It was an act of revenge against Saddam Hussein, and revenge brings together five power games. This is not something new. The symbol for revenge is a five-pointed star, and if you remove the points of the star, you have a pentagon.

Our organization is working to create an international government based on fair and equitable practices, and our first focus is undo the damage that was done in Iraq by the act of revenge that brought in many people. We have a proposal that we have offered to President Obama, called "An Exit Strategy for Iraq." It allows the United States, and your father and brother, and Prime Minister Tony Blair, to gracefully extricate themselves from the conflict, an end to the conflict and everyone to be able to function on a higher level.

Our goal for this proposal is the creation of an international court system so that disputes between nations are resolved in court rather than the battlefield, and the monies now wasted on war will go to support the people instead.

If you are interested in helping on this, I ask that you contact President Obama.

If you are interested in knowing more about the plan, please go to our website at As of today, people in 83 nations support the plan for the international government, including many Muslims, and their names are listed on our website.

Karen Holmes,
The World Peace Organization for the One World Government

Friday, February 19, 2016

Dear President Obama: The Exit Strategy for Iraq is US Economic Stimulus Plan

Our organization is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 83 nations, including Muslim nations, support the plan for the international government.

When you are in crisis, your perspective narrows and you see only two options, and both are untenable. In "The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report," the commission understood that their two options were allowing the institutions to fail or bailing them out at taxpayer expense. The solution to every dilemma was to do what is in everyone's best interest, and you addressed the crises to the best of your ability, and it seems that the solution is working. If your plan does not address the root cause of the crisis, it makes it worse. The root cause of the financial crisis is the power game of Greed.

To bail them out was to choose to go straight ahead, and to pass the crisis on to future generations, while it seemed like a good idea, the US economy is on the slippery slope.

We cannot continue as we are, fighting ISIS, or competing with Asian nations, and Wall Street seems to have become the enemy.

There are four main problems with the economy, and the first to address is to plug the hole to the Middle East. Our Exit Strategy for Iraq does that. It is a US economic stimulus plan.

Dear Mr. Speaker of the House Paul Ryan:

Our organization has been working to create an international government based on the U.S. Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 83 nations, including Muslim nations, support the plan for the international government.

This morning in the news, you are quoted as admiring James Madison because he is known as the Father of the Constitution. History is repeating itself now with the creation of the international government because mankind is taking the US Constitution to the international level.

Our plan helped to open the dialogue between the United States and Iran, because Ahmadinejad heard of it from our letters to the ambassadors, and his support for the plan brought in Fidel Castro, then Hugo Chavez, then Evo Morales, and then Kim Jong Il. They all stated in the media their support for world peace. They believe they are equal to others, and the judgment against them is oppressive. They want to be equal to the other world leaders.

This plan gives mankind the opportunity to function on a far higher level, and will create a global renaissance. What we must let go of is the old power games of war, and regime change, because those games never worked, because there is always a backlash to the games. The future will be based on making win-win agreements for what we need, rather than regime change to gain natural resources and control of strategic locations.

I ask that you participate in the debate for the international government. Become the James Madison of this generation. Writing the international constitution will be addressed when our organization hosts a conference of world leaders. What must come first is that if the US Constitution is to be the basis for the international government, we must purify our legal system of laws that have created chaos in the system to prevent the chaos from spreading onto the international government.  We have a plan for that, but first, we must amend our Constitution to create the additional layer of government within our own nation.

The planning for the creation of the international government can be found on our website at

President Obama is aware of the plan. Please talk to him about it. Time is of the essence because the presidential election can have an impact on whether the United States will support the plan.

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Dear President Obama--The solution to the Iranian issue

Our organization is working to introduce a plan for an international government. As of today, people in 83 nations support the plan for world peace.

Tonight I would like to address an issue that must be addressed before the plan for the international government can move forward. There is a point-counterpoint concept.

The plan for the international government opened the dialogue with the Iranians, in fact several of the so called Axis of Evil dictators. They like the plan because it allows them to be equal to the other nations, and to the president of the United States. They see themselves as equal, but the judgment against them is oppressive. People who have been oppressed lack equality, and this is why so many people around the world support the plan for the international government. It treats people fairly and equally.

The real question is whether Iran will use nuclear power for peaceful purposes or to get revenge. Iran is a technologically-oriented nation, and the focus of technology is having a plan--the power--the innovative technology. The United States is the overview concept because we are a melting pot of nations. We encompass all the concepts, including having a plan and technology, business and economics, crisis in the family, conflict resolution and tolerance and empowerment. We also look to the future. Iran is one segment of that.

The counterpoint of having a plan is conflict resolution, and that is why the Iranian issue must be addressed, and how revenge works and why it doesn't work.

There is a nation that is opposite to Iran, and it addresses conflict resolution and technology for peaceful purposes.  I am not sure, but it could be the Dominican Republic. That nation has experienced years of conflict, and now wishes to move forward into the future with new technology.

This issue can be resolved easily, but then the real focus will be on the acts of revenge against Saddam Hussein, who was declared Axis of Evil, and this judgment triggered a global genocide.

Undermining the revenge against Saddam Hussein

The plan for the international government has been opened to debate, and we have affiliate members in 83 nations. It is time now to draw in the independent members. Each of our 200 independent members and his or her family is parallel to a nation, and people won't come into the framework of the cooperation of nature unless squeezed to do so. We are at the point in the planning process that is called "herding cats," which are notoriously difficult to herd.

Imagine willingly letting go of the United Nations. It has had to prove that it can't end or prevent wars for everyone to agree to let it go. The world's leaders have had to be searching for a new plan to which everyone will agree. The new plan must be already in existence, and solving problems, and be able to address the conflict that arises from those who function only for their own interests. This leads to three choices, and two are untenable. The failing old structure, the one that is based on power games and puts one person over another, and the new structure that is in everyone's best interest. This final choice is the one that allows mankind to evolve to a higher level.

Since 2008, people have been squeezed to make this choice, to go up, down or straight ahead. Straight ahead is to ignore the crisis and pass it on to future generations, and it takes seven generations to undo the damage. The choice to go down into the power games leads to conflict, and there are always backlashes to the games. The choice to go up is to stand on the principles.

Our potential independent members have been squeezed, and many have stood on the principles and their spouses have chosen to go down in the power games. The choice to go up is the logical choice, but those who play the power games have been getting revenge, which draws together people who play the five power games of war, genocide, massacres based on the game of greed, slavery and terrorism. Some seem to think they can function with impunity, and see this as their opportunity to get their life on a higher level. Many people have been backed into a corner and see no way out of it.

Our focus now is to unravel the acts of revenge.

This is where the Iranians come in. The question has been, will Iran use its nuclear capacity for peaceful purposes or for revenge? Are the Iranians standing on the principles or going down into the power games?

To undermine the "Pentacle of Power"--the five games of revenge--we, as a planet, must look at what set the stage for the misunderstandings, and made so many diverse groups of people all seek to get revenge on Saddam Hussein. What common goal did they have, and what did they want to get out of their power games?