Saturday, December 26, 2015

Dear President Obama: Don't try to convince the world leaders to join the international government.

My organization is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 82 nations support the plan for the international government.

Our proposals are lined up like dominoes in a huge layout, so one triggers the next. There is no way you will ever be able to bring any of the world leaders into the plan by making offers. All the others nations form a huge pool of potential participants. The United States can be considered the overview concept, and we are the first nation to come into the plan. Everyone else will watch us as we work to create it within the United States. Then, each month the focus will shift from one nation to the next, and we will build a foundation for the international government. The first eight nations have all one thing in common, and that is we fell into crisis because of a sense of judgment.

If the United States does not choose to participate in the creation of the international government, a modified form of it will be established in another nation.

There is a counterpoint concept that we are addressing first, like taking a step backwards to have something to push off from. That is the Exit Strategy for Iraq, which addresses conflict resolution, and sets the stage for the creation of the international court system so disputes between nations are resolved in court rather than the battlefield.

The solution to every crisis is to do what is in everyone's best interest.

Friday, December 25, 2015

Unifying The World

Dear Friends of Peace,

First, I want to wish everyone a very Merry Christmas.  Today I would like to speak about how to keep the spirit of Christmas in your heart all year long.

When you are looking at a very complex concept, the best place to start is to look at the overview—unifying--concept, and then look at the segments, and then the individual ideas and principles, and their applications. If you start with just the segments, it is hard to see the whole picture.

With religion, which is a very complex concept, the place to start is with the Faith of the Pure Ray. If you are a Christian or a Muslim, you may think your religion is the only one there is, and leave everyone else out of God’s Creation. The Faith of the Pure Ray stands on the principles that each of the world’s seven major religions teaches one segment of the body of knowledge that is necessary to understand to create the life you want. It unifies all the world’s major religions, because the one thing every person on the planet wants is to be able to create the life each of us wants.

The Pure Ray is the overview concept. The Rainbow concept.

You don’t have to let go of your own religion to address the Rainbow concept. It fulfills your own religion and takes it one step further. If you want to know how to create the life you want, today, start with the Faith of the Pure Ray. Today is Christmas, and Christianity teaches the principles of Creativity. Of coming up with a plan that benefits everyone.

The Rainbow concept also applies with sacred books--the Bible and the Koran, and the others. The sacred books for each of the seven major religions were introduced to their cultures because the people were ready to accept them. They are written from the perspective that they apply to all, but they are segments of the whole, and focus on the principles of the segment. The sacred Rainbow books are those that I am in the process of channeling, “channeled messages from God on how to overcome any crisis.” I was told they are the new Bible, but just as the Bible was written by many people and compiled into one, so will my organization’s books.

On The Rainbow Peace Store is based on the planning process, and you Walk the Rainbow to create the life you want. You don’t have to be part of my organization to create the life you want. Anyone on the planet can walk the Rainbow, but at this time, to prove they work, and I can only sell my books to my organization’s independent members. The next step is the application of Creativity, and that relates to the Rainbow concept projects.

Today, we unified the world’s seven major religions, and we have unified their spiritual books. Nothing is finished yet. Only enough information has been introduced to open the idea to debate. World peace takes everyone working together to bring it about, and your participation is just important as everyone else’s. There is enough information available to you now to start your own journey to create the life you want.

Yours for peace,

Sunday, December 13, 2015

Dear Congressman DeFazio: Our solution for ISIS

I would like to offer you a solution for dealing with ISIS that does not involve fighting and drawing together a coalition. The problem with fighting ISIS is that you create a feud and risk being toppled, and by drawing together a coalition you jeopardize your allies when their own sleeper cells rise.

ISIS is not a terrorist organization. The root cause of terrorism is that people on the bottom are denied a voice and must raise their voice to be heard, oftentimes to the point of violence.

ISIS is a ripple of people who were brought into a genocide--genocidaires. They were told lies and made a life-choice to participate, and because they were unaware of the truth, they are angry that their lives have been torn apart. They are trapped in the illusion and see no way out of it, and are getting revenge. They lose all hope that their life will ever return to normal, so it is a form of mental illness and depression.  They may breaking the law, and have no legal recourse. People are trying to kill them on both sides. It is a form of slavery.

Think of the Vietnam War, where US soldiers lived in hell because they could be shot by the Vietcong or fragged by their own side as a victim of criminal behavior or by rogues who were mentally ill and getting revenge on everyone.

Another example is the independent voters, the last segment to make their choice, and the segment that can sway the election. This segment of the population can trigger rebellions when they are dragged into conflict by lies and are being squeezed. They want to live their lives without interference, and this is an inalienable right denied to them by people in power who think only of themselves.

The solution to this crisis starts with the Exit Strategy for Iraq, and depends on our government supporting the plan for world peace.

The global genocide started with the preemptive strike on Iraq, and so the original conflict is between George W. Bush and Saddam Hussein--or his lieutenant. The character defamation of Saddam Hussein enabled other world leaders to rise in power based on their power games of choice.

The proposal leads to the creation of the international court system so disputes between nations are resolved in court rather than the battlefield. There is no need to draw people into conflict--including child soldiers.

World leaders who attempt to drag their population into conflict through their power games will lose power in the international arena. A nation's power within the international government will be based on population rather than brutality or military strength. The international House of Representatives will be based on the same principles as the US House of Representatives.

Our organization has the capacity to unravel the illusion that is dragging people into the conflict. We have our World Peace Marketing Strategy, which can be found on our website,, and books and projects that have the capacity to help this segment of the population find peace in their lives. It gives everyone their inalienable rights to live their life without interference, which is what people who have been dragged into genocide lack.

Friday, December 11, 2015

Letter to Congressman DeFazio

I am aware that individually you do not have the power to influence President Obama's foreign policy, but because the plan for the international government has been opened to debate and is influencing his foreign policy, and because the plan for the international government must go through normal legislative channels, you do have the power to influence foreign policy.

Today I would like to explain that there is no need to fight ISIS, that the solution is to support the plan for the international government. Attempting to stop ISIS from expanding in the Middle East opens the door for world leaders who may or may not have the same goal as the United States to move into Iraq.  Because the conflict devolved as a genocide, which is based on weaving an illusion, our government does not know who to trust. What if I tell you that you can trust Bashar al Assad, but none of the other coalition nations?

With ISIS cells in every nation, all are not sleeping but are actively working to undermine the governments by making promises to parts of their leadership, so there is a schism forming within the governments. An example of this is in Cuba, with Fidel and Raul Castro. One is standing on the principles and the other is playing power games. It is not time to bring in Cuba. It is fine to open a dialogue, but not to trust anyone. The dialogue demonstrates intent.

It is also not time to bring in Iran. The Iranian influence in Iraq continues to expand under the Shia-led government, just as it did under Nouri al-Maliki, and there is a growing threat of sectarian war.

The solution to it all is the creation of the international government, and take it step by step based on our planning. Consider the nations to be a pool of potential members of the international government, but none have made the commitment. We are introducing solutions one step at a time.

The first step to consider is that if the present structure cannot end or prevent wars, and rather than fall into a global conflict, is it time to consider creating a new structure that can end or prevent wars, and opening the idea to debate.

Can the UN do it? Reform the UN? Is anyone willing to become part of the caliphate?

No one must choose at this time whether to join the international government. We are looking at one proposal at a time, speaking from a legislative perspective, and the first is our Exit Strategy for Iraq, which is contingent on the constitutional amendment. If our government accepts the Exit Strategy, we can gather the interest for the amendment, which solves issues like purifying the legal system, a balanced budget, campaign financing reform, an a host of other issues that are too hot for Congress to address under the present structure.