Monday, October 27, 2014

Dear President Obama: How to end the threat of Ebola

October 26, 2014


Our organization is working to introduce a plan for an international government based on the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 76 nations, including Muslim nations, support the plan for the international government.

I have been offering you solutions to global issues, and tonight I would like to explain to you how the plan for the international government can help with the Ebola crisis.

Scientists are not sure yet about how viral diseases come about. Our technology team will address this, and it relates to Christian teachings also, and that is "what you believe is what is." Viruses are manifested belief structures. The symptoms related to the Ebola virus are bleeding and death. Blood relates to one's life, and people die when they believe they can't get the life they want.

As a dental hygienist, I was responsible for taking medical histories, and then counsel patients on their stress related medical problems. I got to know my patient's life crises, and I was able to correlate them easily. Our organization even has a way to heal pancreatic cancer, which is nearly 100% fatal. Family case histories are oftentimes overlooked by doctors.

The World Health Organization says that the  locations where the Ebola virus has broken out have experienced long periods of conflict. It is as if the conflict is draining the life out of the people. If you consider that wars and genocides destroy the economy and infrastructure, it is easy to see that belief structure could be prevalent, and that people could fall back to hunting wild animals for food.

Africa has seen long periods of conflict.

The plan for the international government guarantees to every person on the planet their inalienable rights, to be able to create the life they want without interference, to be treated fairly and equally, and to have a voice in their government. In the era of the international government, medical crises like Ebola will disappear. Degenerative diseases like fibromyalgia will be a thing of the past. The conditions that support them just won't be there.

I recommend that your foreign policies that will lead to years of fighting ISIS be addressed. That instead you consider supporting the plan for the international government, which has the potential to lead to a global renaissance. Instead of getting further into the conflict, step away from it and support the World Peace Plan.

It is fine to continue to defend our nation, from ISIS and from Ebola, we need to be also embracing a plan that allows everyone on the planet to function on a higher level.

Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes,
Principal
The World Peace Organization for the One World Government

 



Saturday, October 18, 2014

Dear President Obama: Enslavement of Iraqi Women and Children by ISIS


Dear President Obama:

Our organization is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 76 nations, including Muslim nations, support the plan for the international government.

The slavery issue in Iraq can be addressed and resolved by the proposed international government because it guarantees to every person on the planet their inalienable rights granted to all the peoples of the planet by the Creator of us all. Our inalienable rights are to be able to create the life we want without interference, to be treated fairly and equally, and to have a voice in our government.

Our inalienable rights are abrogated by the governments and people in power that rely on power games to make a presence on the international level or within the nations, because the games are oppressive to the people.

The rise of slavery is one of the ripples of effects that have gone out from the Iraq War. It is one of five games that make up the act of revenge. People who play the game of slavery fear intimacy, and they believe they can gain it by joining with the others in the act of revenge. The revenge is a means to an end. ISIS is enslaving women and children to enable themselves to gain a voice and a sense of abundance.

People who are enslaved are vulnerable to the attacks because they have no place to go. No sense of home.

America is a melting pot of cultures and religions. An American can look like anyone on the planet. Our national identity is that of diversity. In Iraq, people generally identify with sects or tribes, and secondly that they are Iraqis, which alienates Iraqis who are different in some way.

Under the existing paradigm, national borders were drawn across cultures to keep the people destabilized, but under the international government, the borders may be redrawn based on common cultures, and there may be up to 500 nations. To counter that effect, a nation will have more power in the international House of Representatives by staying together.

The first right a citizen will have guaranteed to him or her is the right to leave a country if he feels he is being oppressed. Governments that are oppressive to their people will lose power on the international level, so they will have to turn their attentions inside their country to enable the people to prosper to maintain their power.

At the same time, nations that offer greater rights will see an increase of immigration, which will probably be short-termed because the people of the same culture generally prefer to stay together.

Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes,
Principal



Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Dear President Obama: World Peace Will Be the Will of the People

Our organization is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 76 nations, including Muslim nations, support the plan for the international government.

At first, only a few individuals will see the potential for the plan for the international government, and those are the people whose perspective is the overview, the way the United States can be considered the overview concept for the planet. We are a melting pot of cultures and religions. The overview perspective comes first to introduce the idea for the international government, but then we must draw in the other nations whose perspective is narrower. We don't expect everyone to see the wider perspective.

Those whose interests depend on gamesmanship are threatened by the introduction of the plan for the international government, and they will hold on tenaciously to the old paradigm. 

This comes to a Moment of Choice between two people, and one will stand on the principles and the other will rely on the games. This leads to a series of battles. This is what is creating the friction on the planet at this time. The choices have gone out and they have created a schism within governments.

It is a matter of interpretation, the difference between the intent of the law and the letter of the law. 

The plan for the international government must come slowly and in perfect order, and as we address one issue at a time, the nations will start to line up in a row.  Until their issues are addressed, the schism will exist in each of the nations. For the plan to be accepted in that nation, we must offer the leadership something that enables them to function on a higher level. This in effect, enables the creation of a flat hierarchy, where the side that is relying on the games is attempting to coerce their goal of a vertical hierarchy.

Participation in the international government must come by invitation of the people, not by the world's leaders sitting down to write a treaty, which is what everyone assumed was necessary, and was frustrated that the world's leaders refused to do at the many summits. The world's leaders will never agree to a treaty, but will agree to a constitution once they see how the plan benefits them.

The United States will demonstrate how the new international government will function, as the result of the will of the people, when our nation works to amend our Constitution to create the additional layer of government. Now, they see our president as the most powerful person on the planet, and don't understand that power is derived from the people of the nation. 


Karen Holmes,
Principal

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Dear President Obama: Ending Disputes Between Nations


Concerning the creation of an international court system that can end disputes between nations.

Our organization is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 76 nations, including Muslim nations, support the plan for the international government.

At the present time, there is no international protocol for ending disputes between nations. It is our responsibility to create one because the conflict in the Middle East is not just a dispute and resolving matters as usual. Relying on usual tactics, such as what Leon Panetta recommends, will keep the United States at war for the next 30 years.

This crisis is a dilemma, and the solution to every dilemma is to do what is in everyone's best interest, not just the interests of the United States.

Our Exit Strategy for Iraq is the solution to this crisis, which is based on the acts of revenge and covert and overt actions to destabilize a regime, and in this case, it is the United States and many other nations that are facing this crisis.

There is a schism that has formed within governments, and the one who stands on the principles sees the crisis, and the other only sees this as the opportunity to get back his or her power, and does not see how destructive it is to align themselves with people outside of the family/country.

This is occurring within the United States between the Democrats and the Republicans, where the Republicans see this crisis as their opportunity to regain their power and support but don't have a plan to end the conflict except for waging war for the next 30 years. They may believe they can go to allies in the War on Terror, who weave an illusion because the root cause of terrorism is not that some people are good and some are bad, and the bad want to hurt the good.

Because this is occurring in many nations around the world, it is demonstrating the present international structure cannot end or prevent wars and genocides, so a new structure must be set into place that can.

A genocide is based on illusion, and it is impossible under the present international structure to have a fair trial. You may see this with the case against Kenyatta in the ICC.

Every nation has the right to decide its own leadership, but it must come from within the country, not from outside influences, and this is the solution. It allows the US to withdraw gracefully from Iraq, and still have access to oil reserves and a strategic location but without putting US citizens at risk.

Our Exit Strategy for Iraq is the solution to this. It is a protocol for ending genocides and establishes an international court system that sees through the illusion of the genocide, and allows future disputes to be handled in court.


Friday, October 3, 2014

Dear President Obama: New Threats to the United States

(In regards to the Bush administration's claims that you are responsible for the rise of ISIS)


Our organization is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 76 nations, including Muslim nations, support the plan for the international government, and amongst our list of affiliate members are many people of power.

In the past, I have written to you about the fact that the present conflict in Iraq, including ISIS, is based on the power games associated with revenge, a character defamation campaign against Saddam Hussein. To stop a genocide, someone must stand up to defend the person who is being defamed. Over the last 10 years, many people have stood up to declare there were no WMD, including Hans Blix, but nothing has been done officially about these protests within the United States.

Now President Bush and members of his administration are declaring that their actions were justified in keeping down terrorism within the Middle East, and those claims are based on a false definition about the root cause of terrorism. Their plot to defame and undermine Saddam Hussein started a genocide, and ripples after ripples of effects have gone out to draw every person on the planet into the crisis.

We are facing a new threat within the United States, and that is that there is the potential for genocide between the Democrats and the Republicans. During the Iraq War, the Republicans seemed to have all the power, and then when the Democrats got into power, the Republicans seemed to lose all their power base, and have not been able to regain it. The problem is that once the Republicans regain their power, which is based on waging war, they can become very oppressive, and this is why only the president of the United States, who is supposed to represent all Americans, can solve this problem. He must find a plan that stands on the principles and it must address the root cause of the crisis and benefit everyone.

By standing up to defend Saddam Hussein, it starts to undermine the one who wages war, the person in the game of revenge who believes he has the right to put another down. That starts to undermine the perpetrators of the game of Anger--the terrorists--who now have no reason to raise their voice to be heard.

The solution to this mess is the plan for the proposed international government, because it solves this crisis and every other dispute between nations.

As a nation, particularly now with Bush's claims that they had the right idea about handling the Middle East crisis, we must start to address the root cause of the crisis.

The Bush administration justified the conflict with democratization. Their preemptive strike went against the US legal system's premise that someone is presumed innocent until proven guilty--because you cannot defend yourself from prejudice and ulterior motives. Their ulterior motives were not democratization but to gain control of Iraq's oil reserves and a strategic location in the Middle East. The conflict resulted in gaining neither. Iraq is in civil war and our relations with nations that allow us to have military bases in the region are strained. This dispute undermined our power base and enabled others to fill the power vacuum as they jockeyed for power, including the people in power who play the power games of illusion--including President Bush--because of his Grand Lie to justify the preemptive strike.

Our Exit Strategy for Iraq is the solution because it allows George W. Bush to have what he wants, what the act of revenge was supposed to give him, but without enabling the games to continue, and that is a sense of pride and success, and the United States the opportunity to get oil contracts with Iraq--based on the proposed international government's departments of Commerce and Natural Resources.

This also prevents the United States from falling into a genocide between the Democrats and Republicans that is unfolding now.