The Economic Foundation for the International Government

Fibonacci

The international government will be based on two proven concepts--the U.S. Constitution and the cooperation of nature. The United States is a land of diverse cultures and religions, and our Constitution has kept us in a state of peace for over 200 years, except for the Civil War of the 1860s. The principles of the cooperation of nature have enabled a sense of abundance for every part for billions of years.

Basing a global economy on the principles of the cooperation of nature makes sense, but more to farmers, who see a sense of abundance in nature when one seed can become a billion seeds in just a few generations, than to the global industrialists and politicians, who are used to power games of one-upmanship, and may see nature as being the survival of the fittest. How do you explain to someone who is climbing the ladder of success that a flat hierarchy achieves greater results?

Nature functions based on Universal Law. An Italian mathematician, Fibonacci, discovered the principles of the cooperation of nature. He was considered to be "the most talented Western mathematician of the Middle Ages," but, as I said, farmers and hunters and gatherers were living their lives based on these principles since the dawn of civilization. They knew that if you killed all the game animals, the next year, they would starve. There is Cause and there is Effect. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, according to Sir Isaac Newton.   

Coming from a sense of lack leads to a sense of loss. Grabbing for power with games of one-upmanship leads to a loss of power. If you are a farmer, and you weren't able to grow enough to feed your family, you might be tempted to eat all your grain, but where would you find the seeds for the next year's crops? This sense of lack led to ways to save for the future because the sense of abundance leads to abundance. It also led to power games of one-upmanship.

At one of our first prayer circles, Archangel Michael told us that God, the Creator of us all, offers us the 100% of everything we need on a Silver Platter, and how much we take is up to us. Of course, we all thought it would be silly not to accept the full 100%, but then we had to learn how to accept it. He said the first step is to look around and see what we already have in abundance in our life. In our hearts, we have a blueprint for our ideal life, and we are unconsciously drawing toward us what we need, including experiences and relationships.

Nations will find a niche based on natural resources, and for the United States, what sets us apart from other nations is our Constitution. It guarantees to every American our unalienable rights, and that drew people who were looking for greater opportunity from all over the world.

Military might doesn't bring a sense of abundance. Traumatic events create rifts in the region, and within people. Rifts are tears in the energy fabric of the planet, and whatever energy you pour into the region, or the person, until the rift is healed, all efforts will be lost. Rifts last long after the original event that caused the rift has been forgotten.

Our first proposal is our Exit Strategy for Iraq. It plugs the drain on the US economy. We are healing the rift that was formed as the result of the preemptive strike on Iraq.

Healing the effects of the wars and genocides is our first step in building a global economy that leads to a global renaissance. When people have been torn apart by conflicts, they don't see any sense of abundance. When third world nations have vast amounts of resources, they become banks for the industrialized nations, and the resources become a curse to the people. The people throw them away, which leads to covert and overt actions that take away the freedoms of the people. But, there is always a backlash to the games. What you do to others will be done to you. This is not a punishment, but the logical conclusions of coming from a sense of lack.

To create a sense of abundance, you must allow everyone to have a sense of abundance. You don't create a vertical hierarchy and place yourself at the top. You create a flat hierarchy and allow everyone to prosper, and if it is based on one's talents and gifts, you leave no one out of the framework based on the principles of the cooperation of nature, and you work with nature rather than to fight it. The first principle of the global renaissance is that everyone must function from within his or her capacity. We rely on our talents and gifts given to us by the Creator of us all, which we have in abundance. Our talents and gifts are easy to share, and in fact, it benefits us to share them. We can get back 10 times.... 100 times.... 1000 times what we give. This is what Fibonacci discovered about nature--but what the farmers knew all along. 

An open letter to Speaker of the House Paul Ryan

In 2011, our plan for the creation of an international government was leveraged by the ambassadors in Washington DC to the level of the world leaders. Ahmadinejad contacted President Obama, and our plan opened the door to Iran, and then to Cuba. Kim Jong Il was also approached, and he agreed to talks, but the Republicans were not willing to agree to the plan. If you recall, President Carter came out of North Korea declaring "They will talk!" We have posted our proposal to reunify North and South Korea on our website since 2003, and the planning since 2012.

This week, North Korea and South Korea agreed to march together in the Olympics. That has brought the world back from the brink of nuclear war, which was based on failed US foreign policy.

North Korea believes they are equal to the United States. Our plan for the international government allows all nations to be equal, and for disputes between nations to be resolved in court rather than the battlefield, and the moneys now wasted on war to go to the people instead.

This morning, Secretary Mattis is asking Congress to increase military spending to allow our military to prepare for war with China and Russia. That implies that the UN cannot be trusted to end or prevent wars, even between three of the permanent members of the Security Council. With the end of the Korean War based on the creation of the international government, it is time to consider that waging  war is in no one's best interest, especially when we are a debtor nation to China, who manufactures parts of our military ordinance.

We have proposals for eight nations, starting with the United States. The first is our Exit Strategy for Iraq, which leads to the creation of an international court system to end disputes between nations. We ask that Congress consider our plan an opportunity to function on a higher level.

Backing away from the brink of nuclear war

North and South Korea have announced they will walk together in the opening ceremony of the Olympics. There is still resistance to the idea, but can we all agree the Korean War is finally over?

The existing structure based on the United Nations has proven it cannot end or prevent wars. President Trump's foreign policy led the world to the brink of nuclear war. These are two untenable options for mankind. For many years, the world has slipped closer to the abyss as mankind came to realize that there were no solutions to this crisis.

We have built a global economy, but that is not enough to stop mankind from kicking ourselves back to the Stone Age, because much of that economy has been based on games of one-upmanship, which are oppressive to the people.

Mankind has been in a time of darkness, of circular thinking patterns, that we must do something, but we don't know what to do, but we must do something... 

Our organization posted our first eight proposals on our website in 2012, and sent letters to incoming ambassadors to tell them of our plan. Among them is our proposal to reunify North and South Korea.  We opened the plan for debate, and then it was up to the ambassadors to decide whether to take the idea forward. Our proposals are executive summaries only, just enough information to open the idea to debate. Our overview planning is still in its infancy, but already, solutions that allow mankind to function on a higher level have pulled mankind away from the edge of the abyss.

Now it is time to return to the first proposal, and for everyone to take the idea seriously.

Everything starts first on the spiritual level, then progresses to the mental level, and finally, to the physical level. You could say we must have the blessing of our Creator to create a plan that benefits everyone.

Before we were all born, we got together as part of a global soul group to create the plan for the international level. This left us all with a blueprint in our hearts, an idea that something was possible to create, and then we were born. The idea for the plan was introduced at the proper time, when people were praying for a solution, giving mankind the opportunity to function on a higher level. Opening the plan to debate allowed us all to create this plan on the mental level. Now it is time to go back to the first government proposal, and to face the first issue on the physical level, and that is how disputes between nations are resolved.

Mankind always has three choices, but when we are in crisis, we see only two, and both are untenable. If we rely on the existing international structure, we are ignoring the crisis and passing it on to future generations. If we rely on those who are grabbing for power, we devolve into a global conflict, the worst case scenario of a global nuclear war. Our opportunity to resolve disputes in a global court system now exists. It can draw together the entire planet, including those who have relied on the other plans, which are in the process of failing because they have demonstrated they are not in anyone's best interest.

A plan that puts one individual as the emperor of the planet did not occur on the spiritual level. It is impossible for one person to achieve that position of power.

The plan for the international government is the overview idea, but the same process will occur over and over again as the plan for the international government comes about. We will see two groups of people coming together and when the meet, they will draw mankind forward. One of the groups is the people in power who are looking for solutions to the crises, and the other is the people with the solutions who are looking for a voice. In the middle is the rest of humanity, who have an opinion, but their solution for the crisis is not based on the root cause of the crisis, or are not at all interested in the crisis. They cannot pull mankind together to allow us to evolve.

The other two options will still exist for a while, and will fade away or transition. No one will agree to give up their military forces as we all work together to create an international court system. There is no need to do that.

This transition period will last for years. It is up to the older generations who remember war to bring world peace. It is up to the younger generations--our children--to maintain world peace. It is up to the youngest generations to live in world peace.

How ever long it takes, world peace is now not only possible. It is probable, and it is becoming more likely every day.

Rather than to picture the two groups coming together, we will observe mankind separating into four segments of the World Peace Movement, and then the segments separating. The first segment are those who stand on the principles, the second segment come in when they are financially affected. The third come in when their lives are affected, and the final segment will either vote on it or rebel. To avoid the rebellions around the world, it would be in everyone's best interest to join the debate on the plan for the international government.

Global Crises Require a Global Solution

This was posted this morning on our Facebook page in response to China's plan to address the space junk crisis. The space above the Earth is becoming increasingly cluttered with debris, which is becoming a hazard to space travel. China's plan is to build a giant laser in space to shoot down the debris, but some people are concerned that it can be used as a weapon.


The Earth is surrounded by space junk, a threat to mankind's attempts to travel to the moon and beyond. How is the best way to solve this problem, so as this article says, one nation doesn't have the capacity to turn its weapons against the rest of the world, and therefore rule the entire planet? It is in no one's best interest for one nation to have complete control over the rest of the world. When there is a crisis, the solution must benefit everyone. There is no resistance to the plan when everyone is involved with the discussion, and is allowed to have a voice.

There has been talk in the US media recently about increased sightings of aliens. Could this plan be the reason? If China builds a giant laser to rid the world of space junk, could it have an impact on the aliens who are watching us? Or, are they watching us because mankind is moving toward world peace under the plan for the international government and soon we may qualify for participation in the galactic federation?

In "A Manual for Peace," which will come out soon, and is associated with our Exit Strategy for Iraq proposal, Seth tells us there are 80 species of aliens on the planet, and mankind must integrate our alien parts of self. How is the best way to do that?

For one nation to have first official contact could seem to be a great advantage. It could also become another global crisis. When the white people moved west into the territory of the Native Americans, which is made up of many tribes, the ones who were more willing to work with the whites became technologically advanced when supplied with guns.

 How can mankind avoid the games of one-upmanship that allowed the white people to take over the land that would one day become the United States?

To understand the future, we must go deeper into the past than the early 1800s. The Earth has been visited by aliens many times in the past. During the time period of Atlantis, aliens provided mankind with technology based on crystals that allowed the Atlanteans to  power flying machines. There was a peaceful civilization, Lemuria, on the opposite side of the planet, and when a group of technology-oriented Atlanteans decided to focus the laser through the planet to attack the Lemurians, they tore apart the planet.

Our organization recommends that before we integrate our alien parts of self, we first work toward unifying the entire planet. We recommend technology review, and that even if some new invention is innovative and would seem to be in everyone's best interest, that it must pass cultural review and not be launched until everyone is in agreement for it to come. It must be able to overcome all the objections that arise.

The plan for the international government has been opened to debate, and some people are objecting to the point where they are willing to tear apart the plan. Can they offer a plan that will function on a higher level? Our plan is based on two proven concepts.