The Asians nations see this as their century to shine. China is expanding is presence into the world as it grabs for natural resources, and is also expanding its navy fleet. The U.S. government is aware that we must make the pivot to address this crisis, but what is standing in the way is the crisis in the Middle East. On one side, we have a military threat that is turning into an economic crisis, and on the other side, there is an economic threat that is turning into a military crisis.
The United States cannot fight a war with two fronts, a global conflict that has already started and is progressing. Thankfully, there is no need to fight the rise of Muslim extremism, or to make the pivot to the Asian nations. Both are based on power grabs that will ultimately fail. There is a better solution, one that benefits everyone.
The Chinese are no different than anyone else. This grab for power is occurring all over the world now as the power games reach their ultimate conclusion. They are grabbing for their grand opportunity as if walking toward a door, and on the other side of the door is their dream goal. They don't realize that what is on the other side of it is a Brick Wall. They are 180 degrees from where they think they are, holding onto what cannot help them and pushing away what can. They are moving further from their goal rather than closer to it. It is behind them, not behind the door. They cannot get what they want by playing their power games. No one can.
The Chinese have adopted U.S. business practices, but have taken them one step further. Those business practices are not what make a business strong. They are based on power games, and there is always a backlash to the games. The United States started to move away from those practices years ago. The Chinese have retro-engineered U.S. technology and undercut our prices. While undermining the U.S. economy, under Universal Law, China has also undermined their own economy to compete with the United States in what can be considered an economic trade war.
U.S. foreign policy has relied on regime change to gain control of natural resources and strategic locations, but that power game ended when the United States invaded Iraq preemptively. Rather than to gain control of Iraq's oil reserves and a door into the Asian nations, we started a civil war, and no one gained control of the oil. The games no longer work. Rather than to topple governments and put into power a puppet government, that power game leads to civil war, and no one gets control of the resources.
As China grabs for oil resources based on these failed power games, like the United States in Iraq, humanitarian crises like what occurred in Darfur are the result. When a dictator, like al-Bashar, sells his nation's natural resource at the expense of his people, he can't stay in power long. Making trade agreements with China to line his pocket puts his own life in danger. There is always a backlash to the games.
As a debtor nation to China, if China takes their power games on step further and calls in our debts, and we cannot pay them back, we are backed into the corner. We cannot fight a war with China, nor can we turn over Alaska with its vast oil reserves. We are backed into a corner with two untenable options.
The solution to every dilemma is to do what is in everyone's best interest. That is to support the creation of the international government, which benefits everyone. Everyone gets what they want without resorting to the failed power games.
Our organization is doing what no one has ever thought is possible. Besides working to create a plan for world peace, we are unifying the world's seven major religions.
Our organization is introducing the Faith of the Pure Ray, which declares that each of the seven major religions teaches one segment of the body of knowledge that is necessary to create the life you want. The one thing that every person on the planet wants is to be able to create the life they want without interference. This is an inalienable right granted to us by the Creator of us all.
If you arrange all seven of the major religions into a circle, like pieces of a huge pie, you can see that the pie is based on the planning circle. Anyone who wants to learn how to create the life he or she wants can learn the principles that each of the religions teaches and create the life they want based on these principles. They can still keep their own religion.
The United States is predominantly a Christian nation, which focuses on coming up with a plan that is the solution to a problem. When a Christian's plan doesn't address the root cause of the problem, it makes the crisis worse. Christian plans must address the opposite side of the planning circle, which is the "glitches" aspect to find a sense of balance. On the opposite side of the planning circle from Christianity is Islam, which focuses on protesting when someone isn't standing on the principles.
The preemptive strike on Iraq went against the principles, and it created a huge protest from the Muslim nations. Now, to stop the rise of Islam extremism, the United States must come up with a plan that does stand on the principles--and make the effort to create the plan, because having a plan but no follow-through around the planning circle is also not standing on the principles.
The Chinese culture is based on Confucianism, which focuses on the Capacity segment of the planning process. On the opposite side of the planning circle is the Support segment, which must be addressed for there to be a sense of balance. The support issues relate to bringing in the money. China cannot continue to undermine its own people and their economy. They cannot rely on failed business practices like manufacturing cheap items that U.S. companies outsource. They must express their capacity and offer satisfying jobs for their own people.
The United States makes trade agreements with our competitors which makes no sense. Like China, we should be making trade agreements with third world nations, but not with dictators that line their pockets at the expense of the people. Third world nations oftentimes have vast resources but they become "bank accounts" for the industrialized nations, and we don't need to start genocides to gain control of natural resources.
The solution that allows everyone to function on a higher level is the creation of the international government, and its departments will ensure that trade agreements are fair and equatable, and don't oppress the people. This allows the United States, China, and third world nations, like the Sudan, to function on a higher level. All the nations will be considered equal, and every nation will have what it needs without oppressing the people.
The United States doesn't have to do a pivot to the Asian nations. We can pivot into the United States and work to build our own economic foundation based on the highest economic principles. We can demonstrate to the entire planet that this is a plan that benefits everyone on the planet--based on the cooperation of nature principles.
The United States relies on corporations rather than small businesses, and while the US government has many programs that benefit the lowest economic structure, it is hard to create plans that benefit everyone--that allow even the lowest levels to rise. To take a homeless person and enable that individual to rise to the top is almost a miracle. It is possible only when the individual functions based on the principles of the cooperation of nature--and understands the principles of the Faith of the Pure Ray.
The Faith of the Pure Ray teaches the principles of each of the seven major religions. It teaches a body of spiritual principles that enable every person on the planet to create the life they want. Anyone who wishes to get their life on a higher level will be able to go to a Faith of the Pure Ray church to learn the principles of all the religions while keeping their own religion. This will enable a sense of unification and tolerance to be created across the planet.
Faith of the Pure Ray "churches" will include offices of the international government, which will guarantee the rights of the people to leave a nation if the individual believes he is being oppressed. The offices of the international government will be able to relocate people to nations that offer greater freedoms. But as the requests are processed, the refugees will be encouraged to attend the classes to learn the principles of how to create their life on a higher level, so any nation that accepts them will have people who function on a higher level than those who have been severely traumatized by acts of war and genocide, or may intend to infiltrate into other nations as sleeper cells.
The international government has two legislative houses, and the House of Representatives is based on population. The power a nation has will be based on population, so a nation that is oppressive will lose its people and its power base. Practices that are oppressive to the people will no longer work.
The first principle of the global renaissance is that everyone function from their own capacity. Do we want a global conflict or a global renaissance?
A plan for an international government based on two proven concepts: the U.S. Constitution and the cooperation of nature.
Tuesday, May 31, 2016
Sunday, May 29, 2016
Leaving Saddam Hussein Out Again?
The release of the Chilcot Report is the point where the plan for the international government is now possible. The energy is building now for the change as the old structure proves to be collapsing.
The plan for world peace has been opened to debate, and many people see it as the solution to the problems we are facing as a nation and a planet.
This is a Moment of Choice for Tony Blair and George W. Bush. Both men have lost a great deal of power. They are facing the backlashes from Universal Law. By putting Saddam Hussein down, they went down in power and Saddam Hussein went up--even if he is dead. The Exit Strategy for Iraq allows them to assume responsibility to undo the damage they have done, and to regain the power they lost through their failed foreign policy decisions.
There has been resistance to the plan for the international government by those who have their own agenda, but as the plan for the international government rises, this is the time when by forcing one's own agenda over what is in everyone's best interest, the power game is exposed.
The Chilcot Report is not the only factor at this time. The next presidential election is coming up and both front-runners are very powerful people who believe the United States is still the most powerful nation on the planet, and as they rise in their own power, they can sway the general population away from the need to choose world peace at this time.
The plan for world peace has been opened to debate, and many people see it as the solution to the problems we are facing as a nation and a planet.
This is a Moment of Choice for Tony Blair and George W. Bush. Both men have lost a great deal of power. They are facing the backlashes from Universal Law. By putting Saddam Hussein down, they went down in power and Saddam Hussein went up--even if he is dead. The Exit Strategy for Iraq allows them to assume responsibility to undo the damage they have done, and to regain the power they lost through their failed foreign policy decisions.
There has been resistance to the plan for the international government by those who have their own agenda, but as the plan for the international government rises, this is the time when by forcing one's own agenda over what is in everyone's best interest, the power game is exposed.
Saddam Hussein is dead, but the ripples of effects from the preemptive strike continue to go out to affect more and more people. To choose to ignore the crisis doesn't address these ripples and so mankind is kicked further off course. The crises will be passed on to future generations, and it will take seven generations to undo the damage. Like waves coming in and going out, it will take seven waves to build up the energy and momentum again to carry the solution forward to completion.
The Exit Strategy for Iraq is a U.S. economic stimulus plan that plugs the drain on the U.S. economy to the Middle East. By refusing to accept this proposal, there is no way to stop the conflict in the Middle East, and the drain on our economy as we slide deeper into the feud.
The Exit Strategy is dependent on the U.S. Constitutional Amendment proposals, where the people of the United States assume responsibility for the damage we have done and work to regain our power that we lost as the result of the preemptive strike on Iraq. When we denied the Iraqi people their inalienable rights, we lost ours. Now to get them back, we must guarantee them to every person on the planet.
Will we leave Saddam Hussein out again?
The United States does not have to be part of the plan for world peace. Our organization will continue to offer proposals to the other nations, and at the conference in Europe, the delegates will decide what to do about bringing in those nations who have decided not to participate. The United States will have another chance at that time to join.
Friday, May 27, 2016
Power comes from assuming responsibility
The end of time is the point where you come to the understanding that the opportunities no longer exist for you to get the life you want.
We place our trust on something that does not have the capacity to help us, like Jeb Bush seizing the opportunity to run for president of the United States, and maybe fulfilling a family dream of being the first family to have three presidents. His presidency would have allowed his family to have the honor and respect and power they want.
His goal seemed to be within his reach. He walked forward to 2016 with his hand reaching out for a golden doorknob, and when he opened the door, instead of finding what was surely his for the taking, he found a Brick Wall. He didn't understand why it wasn't working. He assumed he had the entire Republican power base with him, and what a horror it must be for him to be supplanted by Donald Trump--a billionaire businessman who never held public office before, and who declared he never intended to run for president.
This is what is occurring all over the world, and it is generating a great deal of fear. People are walking forward and reaching out for what they believe is their grand opportunity to get their life, only to find that on the other side of the door is a Brick Wall.
This is what occurred with George W. Bush when he invaded Iraq. He went in thinking it would be another rout, like it was with the Gulf War. For the Bush administration, the preemptive strike was one small logical step, but for everyone else with a wider perspective, it was a major leap. He got into a quagmire with no apparent way out. This lack of understanding about the principles behind the preemptive strike is what kept Jeb Bush from being president. It was in no one's best interest for Jeb Bush to perpetuate failed foreign policy.
The Brick Wall is the ultimate conclusion of the games people play. People have a goal, but we are kicked off course by misunderstandings and don't see that we are no longer headed toward our goal. At the Brick Wall, we are 180 degrees from where we think we are.
The Chilcot Report is coming out in July, and the Bush family is facing the backlashes from the games they played. The have three choices now for how they will respond to the scandal. They can ignore the crisis and pass it on to future generations, they can go down into the games, or they can choose to stand on the principles and work to undo the damage they have done.
What they want is behind them, not in front of them. If their goal is to have power, power does not come from being president of the United States, or having the US military at your hand. Power comes from assuming responsibility to undo the damage you have done.
The Bush family have been offered the opportunity to regain their power by working with our organization and our Exit Strategy for Iraq proposal. Our goal is to create an international government and its international court system so that disputes between nations are resolved in court rather than the battlefield. We, as a planet, will at last be able to say, "never again."
The opportunity to be president--at least in 2016--is no longer there for Jeb Bush, but that does not mean that this is the end of his opportunities to get the power he wants. He just must turn around and see that it was there all along, but he just didn't see it. If he does that, maybe he will try again in 2020, or understand at that point that he is unlimited as to what he wants to create.
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
Don't assume that anyone is telling you the truth about world peace
The plan for world peace was introduced at the prayer circle, and everyone assumed responsibility for a project. The project for the creation of the international government is the responsibility of only two people, and they have not yet met each other. Only enough information has been introduced to open the ideas to debate.
Imagine that Leonardo DaVinci has just finished his remarkable drawing of a flying machine. Beware the person who tries to sell you tickets!
The overview concept teaches the principles to the next level of people, known as the Flower of Life level, and they draw people into the projects and teach the same principles to the people they draw into the framework. The project ideas go from the most general to the most specific.
At this time, only the first two people on the planet see the wider perspective. They are working on the most general idea from their own area of expertise--they are channels and spiritual teachers. Those who listen to the channeled insights and who think globally are next; the small children are willing to listen and learn because they remember Heaven, and trust those who remember Heaven, too. Everyone else is grabbing for power, or afraid of letting go of what they need to let go of to participate. Some people are ripping others apart and others are being victimized in the attempt to prevent the plan for going forward.
No one has the right to speak for someone else's project.
Generally speaking, there is a line that has formed, based on who listens to who. The children listen to the channels. One of their parents listen to the children, mostly likely the mother, and one of the grandparents listens to them--most likely the grandfather. Then, the adult males of the family listen to the grandfather because they are trying to create a sense of wealth... You see how this goes? The people who listen to the young males are those older men who grew up and never were able to create a solid financial foundation, and they admire the young men for their capacity and opportunity. They joined the conspiracy to pirate the plan as part of a get-rich quick scheme. Finally, there are the pirates who everyone who equates power and audacity believe are the ones who should be the heads of the organization. The last people to understand anything about the plan for world peace are getting revenge on everyone because they believe the plan for world peace is simple and logical, and they are functioning outside of their capacity because they believe their capacity now is on weaving an illusion. They are waging war and genocide, and enslaving others because they think they can outsmart everyone.
The pirates are the last people to come into the framework, not the first.
Our organization has project ideas for everyone, but right now there are many misunderstandings about who has the power and the right to introduce the plan for world peace. Our projects and segments of the organization allow all these people to come into the framework, but first we must address how revenge works and why it doesn't work. Then, and we are also looking at how Relative Time works, which involves the end of the opportunities for people to get their life on a higher level. The fears associated with the end of the opportunities is making people vulnerable to the predations of those who function for their own interests.
Speaking now on the international level, the world leaders know about the plan and assumed they could start to make win-win agreements, such as the Iran nuclear deal. The international government must make trade agreements and security agreements. That must come first. Don't assume anyone has the same goal yet, including joining the plan for world peace. Each of the nations is somewhere along the continuum of frequency, and may be trying to sell tickets on flying machines that don't exist yet.
Tuesday, May 24, 2016
The Chilcot Report Offers Motivation to Accept the Exit Strategy for Iraq
The Chilcot Report is being released in July, and the headlines include words like "brutal" and "savage the reputations." Prime Minister Tony Blair and President George W. Bush will face severe backlashes for their preemptive strike on Iraq, and character defamation campaign on Saddam Hussein.
The report offers everyone incentive for accepting the plan for the international government. The Exit Strategy for Iraq is the solution that enables everyone to function on a higher level.
The report will list facts, but won't necessarily address the root cause of the crisis. Everyone must understand why the preemptive strike and the invasion didn't work the way they thought it would. Revenge are power games that have been used for millennia. Why didn't it work?
Before we can hold the unification and conflict resolutions events at Oxford and Stonehenge, we must bring in the organization members who will be part of the events. That involves the professional publishing team and the technology team. We are looking at the power games associated with revenge, and the choices people have to create the life they want. Because our organization is parallel to the international level, and we are experiencing the same crises, we must resolve the organization's crises based on the insights we have to be able to prove the solutions work.
The plans have been opened to debate, and people have been approached and offers made, but the proposals must go through normal legislative channels. That officially opens the door between the organization and the federal government, and through them the world leaders, and the State Department and the ambassadors.
The plan for the international government was first introduced in 2003, and at that time no one was willing to let go of their agenda to agree to support the plan. People must be squeezed to let of their agenda, and the Chilcot Report offers the motivation for change.
The report offers everyone incentive for accepting the plan for the international government. The Exit Strategy for Iraq is the solution that enables everyone to function on a higher level.
The report will list facts, but won't necessarily address the root cause of the crisis. Everyone must understand why the preemptive strike and the invasion didn't work the way they thought it would. Revenge are power games that have been used for millennia. Why didn't it work?
Before we can hold the unification and conflict resolutions events at Oxford and Stonehenge, we must bring in the organization members who will be part of the events. That involves the professional publishing team and the technology team. We are looking at the power games associated with revenge, and the choices people have to create the life they want. Because our organization is parallel to the international level, and we are experiencing the same crises, we must resolve the organization's crises based on the insights we have to be able to prove the solutions work.
The plans have been opened to debate, and people have been approached and offers made, but the proposals must go through normal legislative channels. That officially opens the door between the organization and the federal government, and through them the world leaders, and the State Department and the ambassadors.
The plan for the international government was first introduced in 2003, and at that time no one was willing to let go of their agenda to agree to support the plan. People must be squeezed to let of their agenda, and the Chilcot Report offers the motivation for change.
Sunday, May 22, 2016
Turning Mankind Around
Mars is bright in the nighttime sky now. The ancients knew that whenever Mars came on the horizon, there would be war. Those who believe war is the solution to the crises we are facing have the power now. Not a good time to debate a plan for world peace--or maybe it is the best time to do so.
The conflict in Iraq devolved as a genocide, not a war, and the knee-jerk reaction that ends a war makes a genocide worse. By listening to the war-mongers, the conflict will get much worse.
Mankind is 180 degrees from where he thinks he is. Something must turn mankind around to get us back on track.
The conflict in Iraq devolved as a genocide, not a war, and the knee-jerk reaction that ends a war makes a genocide worse. By listening to the war-mongers, the conflict will get much worse.
Mankind is 180 degrees from where he thinks he is. Something must turn mankind around to get us back on track.
While waging war seems to be the solution, you cannot get your life by waging war. It will only make things worse, and it becomes a quagmire--a dilemma. Mankind always has three choices, but during times of crisis, your perspective narrows to the point where you only see two options and both are untenable. Like a drowning man pushing away a lifeguard, when you realize you can't do it by yourself, you must let go of your struggles and allow someone who sees the wider perspective to assume responsibility.
The question then is who has the capacity to help you? You have another three choices, and by choosing to go down into the power games, you make your own crisis worse, not better.
As it says in our World Peace Marketing Strategy, people must be squeezed to join the framework based on the cooperation of nature.
The first nation to come in will be the United States. By waging war against ISIS, the crisis can only get worse. Only two options are evident, and both are untenable. One is to continue to be squeezed, and the other is to fight. The third option is not evident, and that is to do what is in everyone's best interest, and to support the plan for the international government.
The idea has been opened to debate amongst the world leaders, and everyone likes the idea. The U.S. government likes the idea, but it is another thing to set aside your own agenda and work to make the changes necessary to create your own part of the plan.
The first change is to open the plan to debate within the United States. This places the choice back into the hands of the people. It is offering the people of the United States, and therefore the entire planet, the third option to go up and to function on a higher level.
The difference between Heaven and Hell is that in Heaven there is a solution to your crisis.
Once the idea is open to debate, everyone will start to consider what we want to keep and what we want to leave behind. We will refine the idea of world peace in our own thinking.
Step by step, mankind will start to turn around from war-based thinking to peace-based thinking.
Saturday, May 21, 2016
The Source
The plan for the international government appears to be simple and logical, and it is, but creating an international government is like building a huge sky scraper. Everyone must have a clear idea of the overall plan, and do their part, and understand what others have done before they move forward on their own part.
The plan must progress slowly and in perfect order. It will take twenty years for it to be completed.
The source of the plan and the planning expert is a seventh dimensional entity named Seth. He is famous for his work as a spiritual teacher through a channel, named Jane Roberts, and together they taught that you create your own reality. Together, they sold over seven million books, which are still popular today, and considered classics of spiritual teachings.
Seth is not solely responsible for the idea. He is one of a twelve-pointed star, and each is responsible for one segment of the plan for world peace. They have one billion people working with them on the other side, each doing their part, including Jane Roberts, who passed away in the 1980s. The idea is now progressing to the third dimension.
Because they are doing what is in everyone's best interest, they have the blessings of God, the Creator of us all. With God's blessing, the plan has all the resources available to us and everyone is involved with the creation of the international government. There are no obstacles when you are doing what is in everyone's best interest.
Seth works through many channels--probably twelve-- but will only write books and proposals through one person--Karen Holmes, whose spiritual name is Suzeranda Melchizedek. The organization is incorporated under the name Seth and Suzeranda Corporation.
The idea for the international government was stolen and participation was offered to the potential independent members of the organization. At this time, the organization only has one independent members and hundreds of affiliate members in 85 nations.
You cannot copyright an idea, especially the U.S. Constitution and the cooperation of nature, and many people have come up with the same idea in the past. But, this plan is based on the principles of the cooperation of nature, which is based on making win-win agreements. The pirates may seem to be connected to the source, but Seth will not channel any additional proposals-sixty in all--until everyone is willing to stand on the principles. The pirated concept will continue to fade away, because it does not have the blessing from God, and therefore doesn't have the resources it needs to be built.
Some people function entirely on the third dimension and do not recognize the role God, the Creator of us all, plays. Everything starts on the spiritual level and progresses to the mental and then to the physical. The spiritual level is having the dream to do something, but then imagine building a skyscraper without blueprints, the funding, and trying to do it by yourself. The dream to do something allows the individual to fulfill their purpose in life, and to absolve all karmic debt.
The principles the organization stands on create a framework of projects, and the organization is like the first project. To bring in the people, Seth and Karen Holmes introduced the ideas for fifty innovative projects. The project ideas were also pirated, but without the connection to the source, the ideas have remained just ideas. We have just enough information to open the ideas to debate, and that proves our intent not to leave anyone out of the debate. Seth will not return to offer additional information until three channels are willing to work together, and they must work with Karen Holmes, as part of her organization.
At first, the pirates seemed to have all the power to create the plan and the projects, but their power base is collapsing. By preventing the others from working on their projects, they don't have project ideas, either. They are breaking Universal Law, and facing the backlashes.
The lesson everyone is learning is that you cannot get your life by breaking Universal Law.
Friday, May 6, 2016
The World Peace Movement is a Paradigm Shift
Every movement starts with a Moment of Choice between two people, when one stands on the principles and that person's choice affects the other's security and support. The second person goes down into playing the power games. The World Peace Movement started when Saddam Hussein protested that the UN sanctions were oppressive to his people, and that affected the security and support of the United States.
Power games are oppressive to the people, and they end when an innocent person is crucified. The preemptive strike on Iraq, when there were no WMD found, collapsed the old paradigm based on power games. It was the ultimate game. The games no longer work.
The collapse of the old paradigm is like a dark cloud on the horizon.
Most people haven't seen it and are living their lives as if nothing is changing. They still think there will always be wars.
Some people see the dark cloud, but believe that allowing the old paradigm to collapse is a great idea--it will shake things up a bit, but then things will stabilize and life will go on as usual. You have the American Civil Rights Movement, for example, and it was a difficult time for the United States, but in the end, we became a much better nation. What occurred within the United States had little effect on the rest of the planet.
What about a global paradigm shift? The question is how far will mankind fall before something better comes along to take its place.
It is the responsibility of those who see the dark cloud on the horizon first to offer the solution, and the solution must be rising as the old structure is collapsing. The plan can keep moving forward until one individual makes a choice to accept it.
When it becomes apparent that the old structure is no longer adequate, the people in power who are responsible for dealing with the crisis start looking for a new plan. Which will it be? Mankind always has three choices. We can ignore the crisis and pass it on to future generations, go deeper into the games, or do what is in everyone's best interest and evolve to a higher level. This is the choice.
Many people still see the United Nations as the global institution responsible for peace. Many now support the creation of the caliphate. More and more people are becoming aware of the plan for the international government. Which will prevail?
The first step in the creation of the international government is looking at why the old structure collapsed. What caused the crisis. This must be addressed so the new structure won't face the same crisis in the future. If your plan does not address the root cause of the crisis, it makes the crisis worse. We believe the root cause of the global crisis is the power games that everyone is playing. They go against Universal Law, and so there is always a backlash to the games. At their ultimate conclusion, they reach the point where the games no longer work.
The legal system of the international government will be based on Universal Law, and our first proposal is the Exit Strategy for Iraq, which sets up an international court system based on Universal Law so that disputes between nations are resolved in court rather than the battlefield.
Power games are oppressive to the people, and they end when an innocent person is crucified. The preemptive strike on Iraq, when there were no WMD found, collapsed the old paradigm based on power games. It was the ultimate game. The games no longer work.
The collapse of the old paradigm is like a dark cloud on the horizon.
Most people haven't seen it and are living their lives as if nothing is changing. They still think there will always be wars.
Some people see the dark cloud, but believe that allowing the old paradigm to collapse is a great idea--it will shake things up a bit, but then things will stabilize and life will go on as usual. You have the American Civil Rights Movement, for example, and it was a difficult time for the United States, but in the end, we became a much better nation. What occurred within the United States had little effect on the rest of the planet.
What about a global paradigm shift? The question is how far will mankind fall before something better comes along to take its place.
It is the responsibility of those who see the dark cloud on the horizon first to offer the solution, and the solution must be rising as the old structure is collapsing. The plan can keep moving forward until one individual makes a choice to accept it.
When it becomes apparent that the old structure is no longer adequate, the people in power who are responsible for dealing with the crisis start looking for a new plan. Which will it be? Mankind always has three choices. We can ignore the crisis and pass it on to future generations, go deeper into the games, or do what is in everyone's best interest and evolve to a higher level. This is the choice.
Many people still see the United Nations as the global institution responsible for peace. Many now support the creation of the caliphate. More and more people are becoming aware of the plan for the international government. Which will prevail?
The first step in the creation of the international government is looking at why the old structure collapsed. What caused the crisis. This must be addressed so the new structure won't face the same crisis in the future. If your plan does not address the root cause of the crisis, it makes the crisis worse. We believe the root cause of the global crisis is the power games that everyone is playing. They go against Universal Law, and so there is always a backlash to the games. At their ultimate conclusion, they reach the point where the games no longer work.
The legal system of the international government will be based on Universal Law, and our first proposal is the Exit Strategy for Iraq, which sets up an international court system based on Universal Law so that disputes between nations are resolved in court rather than the battlefield.
Wednesday, May 4, 2016
Where True Power Comes From
We have looked at the definition of a genocide, that the accepted definition of a genocide does not address the root cause of the crisis so it makes it worse. The same occurs with the definition of power.
Power doesn't come from having a bigger and stronger military, or from having more money. When you equate ideas that shouldn't be equated, it gets you into trouble.
Each of our proposals helps to clarify the misunderstandings. Each proposal has recommended reading that explains the six principles, the application of the principles, and three planning stages that allows for progress.
The first proposal is the Exit Strategy for Iraq. It is not the first proposal that allows for the creation of the international government, but a preliminary step that must be taken to undo the damage that has been done before the plan can progress. We are clarifying the misunderstandings of where true power comes from.
The Pentagon has five sides because that is the symbol of revenge. It represents the five power games that are played as acts of revenge, including war, genocide, massacres based on the game of greed, slavery and human rights violations, and terrorism. If you look at the power associated with the Pentagon, it is hard to imagine that this is also a symbol of why the power games don't work.
The games go against Universal Law, and so there is always a backlash to the games. The games are compensatory games that come from a lack of power. No one has the same goal so they undermine each other.
If you look at the acts of revenge against Saddam Hussein, it is hard to imagine how they could seem to have the same goal. The revenge is a means to an end, not the final destination.
At this time, the U.S. military is recommending increasing the number of troops in Iraq and Syria, but without understanding how the conflict devolved. They don't understand that the knee-jerk reaction that ends a war makes a genocide worse. Genocides are based on weaving an illusion, and they don't know who to trust, because, in the illusion, everything is backwards, and they are holding onto what cannot help them and pushing away what can.
To end a genocide, someone must stand up to defend the person who is being defamed. The issue of the revenge against Saddam Hussein must come first.
Recommended reading for this proposal can be found at www.ontherainbowpeacestore.com. Each proposal has one page of the catalog.
Power doesn't come from having a bigger and stronger military, or from having more money. When you equate ideas that shouldn't be equated, it gets you into trouble.
Each of our proposals helps to clarify the misunderstandings. Each proposal has recommended reading that explains the six principles, the application of the principles, and three planning stages that allows for progress.
The first proposal is the Exit Strategy for Iraq. It is not the first proposal that allows for the creation of the international government, but a preliminary step that must be taken to undo the damage that has been done before the plan can progress. We are clarifying the misunderstandings of where true power comes from.
The Pentagon has five sides because that is the symbol of revenge. It represents the five power games that are played as acts of revenge, including war, genocide, massacres based on the game of greed, slavery and human rights violations, and terrorism. If you look at the power associated with the Pentagon, it is hard to imagine that this is also a symbol of why the power games don't work.
The games go against Universal Law, and so there is always a backlash to the games. The games are compensatory games that come from a lack of power. No one has the same goal so they undermine each other.
If you look at the acts of revenge against Saddam Hussein, it is hard to imagine how they could seem to have the same goal. The revenge is a means to an end, not the final destination.
At this time, the U.S. military is recommending increasing the number of troops in Iraq and Syria, but without understanding how the conflict devolved. They don't understand that the knee-jerk reaction that ends a war makes a genocide worse. Genocides are based on weaving an illusion, and they don't know who to trust, because, in the illusion, everything is backwards, and they are holding onto what cannot help them and pushing away what can.
To end a genocide, someone must stand up to defend the person who is being defamed. The issue of the revenge against Saddam Hussein must come first.
Recommended reading for this proposal can be found at www.ontherainbowpeacestore.com. Each proposal has one page of the catalog.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)