Monday, January 26, 2015

Your Excellency: Simple and Logical Solutions

Our organization is working to introduce a plan for an international government.

The economic foundation for he international government is based on the following criteria:

The most progressive nations may be applying principles that are oppressive to the people, and a far higher foundation involves finding a niche and making win-win agreements.

The economic departments will make trade agreements, which supersede existing treaties. The transition will be gradual, not forced by expediency. Imagine how difficult it would be to tear apart the old structure and replace it with the new. Our agreements with the world leaders involve offering solutions that send out ripples of effects, but do not appear to be difficult to instate because the steps are small, simple and logical.

If it becomes apparent that the present international structure is inadequate, the most logical solution is to do what is in everyone's best interest. For example, the global warming crisis solution involves turning the solution over to the experts in the field who have been denied a voice due to political interference. The blockage has come because the good of the few is more accepted than what is in everyone's best interest.

Rampant gamesmanship is not tolerated in the international government. Greed has resulted in oppressive actions that have torn apart infrastructure and lives. Imagine how the economic might a nation has is no longer based on oppressive policies. The solution is to consider its population to be its greatest asset.

Each nation exports goods and services, and this is its logical niche. What is not apparent is the traditional niche that was lost when the nation was "civilized." Civilization has done great harm to nations. Industrialization has eased the life of the people and how many people can get by without a phone? But, relying on it and competing with other nations that rely on it and the speed in which inventions are replaced by higher functioning devices puts a strain on entrepreneurship and innovation. An individual must be able to compete with major corporations that have the resources to manufacture devices. The solution is to consider what makes each nation and each individual unique, and this is what our organization's advisors will help nations and individuals to discover.

Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes,

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

His Excellency, Sir Peter Westmacott: The Chilcot Report

Your Excellency:

Our organization is working to introduce a plan for an international government based on the U.S. Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 78 nations support the plan.

Once the Chilcot Report has been made public, it will become difficult to demonstrate your nation's intent to prevent further damage that was done by the foreign policy decision to invade a sovereign nation. Our organization is offering to assist you in starting to undo the damage and to save the reputation of Prime Minister Tony Blair.

The preemptive strike on Iraq went against the intent of the U.N. Charter to prevent unprovoked attacks. What seemed like a good idea at the time, when seen from the wider perspective was not in anyone's best interest. As people slide into a crisis situation, their perspective narrows, and oftentimes it takes looking at the issue from the wider perspective to see the solution. Our perspective is very large because we include sources that are generally overlooked.

The simple solution is to make all wars obsolete, and transition the power base a nation has from military might to financial strength based on a nation's resources. I am selecting the nation of England and separating it from the U.K. because each nation has a separate and unique niche. England has forgotten its traditional niche and its historic niche of conflict resolution and unification. To return to is traditional niche allows England to regain its power base.

Our plan to create the international government is based on every nations finding and returning to its niche, and in the process, regain its sense of identity. The Sykes-Picot agreement robbed Iraq of its identity, and our plan is to restore Iraq to its rightful place as sovereign, once they are allowed to be so.

Please look into our plan for the international government. While we do not yet have a separate proposal for England, we do for the Middle East, and our Exit Strategy for Iraq affects England as part of the overview concept. It can be found online at

Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes,

Sunday, January 18, 2015

Your Excellency: "State of the Planet" Address

Our organization is working to introduce a plan for an international government based on the U.S. Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 78 nations support the plan for world peace.

This week marks the anniversary of when the U.N. Genocide Convention went into force. It has not yet been able to stop the genocide that is rippling out from the conflict in Iraq. With no clear understanding of how genocides devolve, there is no clear understanding of how to stop them.

The conflict in Iraq triggered crises that affect in some way every person on the planet, and to stop these crises, our organization first called for a genocide watch, and then offered our plan. Because genocides occur on every level, we offered the diplomatic community the opportunity to watch how our organization's genocide devolved with the understanding that our plan for extricating the United States from the conflict is the solution to both.

Now I would like to address the final step before this series of planned events can be triggered. That is to observe the attempt to fight ISIS will fail unless the nations of the world consider their own participation on the creation of the international government.

Consider, if you will, that power grabs now lead to a loss of power, but that does not mean they are not oppressive. The solution is not to stand and fight, although defense is still necessary. Simultaneously turning attention toward working together to create the international government demonstrates to those who are grabbing for power that there is a better way to function than through oppression.

We would like to turn the focus of the world's leaders not to defense, but to unity in creating a new paradigm for the future, letting go of what we no longer wish to experience and working toward what we do wish. This coming week, President Obama will lay out his plans for the coming year for America, and the diplomats can do the same for the entire planet. A "State of the Planet" address. While you are doing this, our organization will work together to bring the peoples of the world into the debate.

Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes,

Monday, January 5, 2015

New affiliate member nation makes 78!

The seed for world peace has been planted in Honduras!

What makes this so important? 

First, world peace must come from the people, not the world's leaders. World peace requires a grassroots movement and the best form of advertising is word-of-mouth. 

Second, world peace requires cultural review, and if people in 78 nations like the idea, then there is less resistance to the plan. World peace requires a 100% approval rating, so the plan must benefit every person on the planet, and with cultural review, we can compete with existing international institutions, like the United Nations.

Third, our affiliate membership has allowed us to leverage the plan into the diplomatic community level. They bridge to the world leaders because they are average people with plenipotentiary powers.

Sunday, January 4, 2015

Please defend Saddam Hussein

Dear President Obama:

Our organization is working to create an international government based on the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature. As of today, people in 78 nations, including Muslim nations, support the plan for the international government.

Our first issue to address is global, and that is the ripples of crises that have gone out from the Iraq War. Because of the judgment against Saddam Hussein that he was evil, the conflict devolved as a genocide rather than a war. That is why it has been so difficult to resolve.

Most people believe genocides involve ethnic cleansing, and between nations in Africa or Europe, but that is not the rot cause of the crisis. Genocides occur on every level, including within families. Character defamation occurs between individuals, and while it may be difficult to believe, romantic attachments turn into genocides because the couple has different goals. It is much easier to understand how genocides between cultures occur when you compare them to a hostile divorce with acts of revenge.

Revenge combines five power games, and two of the games involve weaving an illusion. The perpetrator of the genocide will weave a web of deceit that is impossible to unravel.

The first step to stop a genocide involves standing up to defend the victim of the genocide. In the case of the global genocide that started as part of the Iraq conflict, the victim was Saddam Hussein. The fact that no WMD were found implies he was attempting to comply with UN sanctions.  No one has the right to judge another as being evil.

The Iraq War was justified with a Grand Lie, and the truth does not overcome the lie. It just reaches the point where no one knows who to trust. That is why demonstrating one's intent is necessary.

As far as ISIS is concerned, that is the result of the genocide in Iraq, and the solution is not to fight, but to defend Saddam Hussein and to introduce the plan for the international government.
A feud would never end and turn into a global war.

People who have been involved with a genocide lack their inalienable rights. The more oppressive ISIS is, the less support it has except from the people who believe that oppression is a power tool of choice. To guarantee the inalienable rights of the people offers the entire planet an unseen third choice, and that is the proposed international government.

The existing international peace-keeping structure is the United Nations, and they have proven that they cannot end or prevent wars and genocides. That option is a slippery slope, although they have done many good things for the planet.

The second option is the caliphate that s based on one individual having supreme power over another--an emperor.

The option that allows everyone to function on the higher level is the proposed international government that is based on two proven concepts and guarantees to every person on the planet our inalienable rights granted to us by the Creator of us all.

Yours for peace,

Karen Holmes,

Saturday, January 3, 2015

Starting the Journey to Create World Peace

Until this time, the idea for the international government has been introduced and opened to debate, and the idea has permeated through society. Now it is time to take the steps to make it a reality.

What gets people into a crisis is equated ideas, and because there is a misunderstanding, if it is not corrected early enough, as minor crises come along and solution does not address the root cause of the crisis, the crisis keeps getting worse. Eventually, it leads to the "end of life crisis."

Because the little steps are so minor, and the decline is so gradual in most cases, the ultimate conclusion of the crisis comes as a complete shock.

I am reminded of the look on the face of President George W. Bush when he first learned of the attack on the World Trade Center.

The root cause of all the crises based on the cycle of misunderstandings are the power games that lead to crisis. Every person on the planet plays the games, and when played by people in power, they lead to war, genocide, massacres, slavery and human rights violations, and terrorism. There are two more games--seven in all--and in the course of the evolutionary development of the plan for world peace, we will address all seven.

The first issue that we are addressing is the character defamation campaign against Saddam Hussein. December 30th marked the 8th anniversary of that date. While some people celebrated his death as being rid of a despotic dictator, and the world is better off without him, the judgment against him as "Axis of Evil" triggered a global genocide.

No one has the right to judge another as evil. Mankind has the right to judge someone guilty of a crime, and even execute that person for proven crimes, but no one can defend himself from prejudice and ulterior motives.

The U.S. legal system is based on the premise that someone is presumed innocent until proven guilty for this reason.

The issue that there were no WMD found means that Saddam Hussein was attempting to comply with U.N. sanctions, and therefore the preemptive strike deprived Saddam Hussein of his inalienable rights granted to us by the Creator of us all to be able to live our lives without interference, to be treated fairly and equally, and to have a voice in our government.

The Iraqi people have the right to decide their leadership.  Iraq is a sovereign nation. Because the preemptive strike went against the intent of the U.N. Charter to prevent unprovoked attacks, in the eyes of the world, the Iraq War that started in 2003 is considered an unlawful war.

This power grab collapsed the existing structure based on the power games, and proved the United Nations is not capable of ending or preventing wars--much less a global genocide. Once it proved incapable of dealing with this crisis, a new international structure that does have the capacity to solve the issues had to be introduced. The collapse of the U.S. power base triggered a mad scramble amongst the world leaders to see who would become the next world superpower.

It is not in anyone's best interest for one individual to become the supreme power--an emperor. That is one choice mankind is facing. Another choice is for the planet to ignore the crisis and continue on down a slippery slope of conflicts. The third choice enables mankind to function on a higher level, and that is for everyone to work together on the creation of the proposed international government that guarantees the rights of the people.

Karen Holmes,