Thursday, July 23, 2015

Letter to Mr. Siddiqui, Gandhi Jinnah Peace Research Institute of South Asia.


Our organization received a letter from a man in Pakistan who has started a non profit organization--Pakistan Chapter of the "Gandhi Jinnah Peace Research Institute of South Asia," and he  is standing in protest against corruption in government. This is a response to his letter that can apply to many similar circumstances around the planet. 


Dear Mr. Siddiqui:

After reading your letters, I would like to share with you what I have learned about getting the attention of the powerful elite. I found that they will only listen if you have the masses behind you and you are introducing a plan that benefits everyone. That is why my organization has affiliate membership. You may be able to open a dialogue, but the change comes within a culture when the people are ready for change—because people will no longer tolerate the power games—and someone offers a plan that benefits everyone.

Why am I telling you this? Isn’t this what Gandhi and Jinnah did to enable India to gain its independence? The old structure based on oppression is collapsing, and the new structure that functions on a higher level is rising in popularity.

Once they reach equal levels, the new structure must not succumb to the same power games that the old structure was based upon, or it too becomes oppressive. It is a matter of standing on the principles of fairness and equality.

Open a dialogue amongst your family and friends and within your organization about how you intend to end the corruption within the power elite amongst the people. Come up with a plan that benefits everyone. From my own experience, the people you are trying to convince have no interest in listening to you, I am sorry to say. There is no incentive to change unless squeezed to do so by the creation of something that functions on a higher level. Leave them in the proverbial dust.

Talk to everyone you know about the plan for the international government. I am not sure if we will have a proposal for Pakistan and India, but start with ending the global genocide that started with the preemptive strike on Iraq. Then I recommend you follow through on the topics of debate as the plan for the international government progresses.

The first idea is that there is always a backlash to the power games. If you grab for power, you are coming from a lack of power. Corruption may seem to work for a time, but the games end when played on an innocent person, such as President George W. Bush and the preemptive strike on Saddam Hussein. The fact there were no WMD means that he was innocent of the charges against him. The grab for power ended up with George W. Bush and Tony Blair losing power.

There is no judgment against them because everyone plays the games, but the games don’t work. What does work is having a plan that benefits everyone.

This first idea is that the games are oppressive to the people, and that disputes between nations should be settled in a legitimate and globally recognized international court system rather than the battlefield. The present structure is unfair and isn’t working. The United Nations has proven it cannot end or prevent wars. The international legal system will be based on Universal Law, to which every person on the planet has been exposed. It guarantees the inalienable rights to every person on the planet—to be able to create the life they want without interference, to be treated fairly and equally, and to have a voice in their government. These are the rights granted to us by the Creator of us all, and denied to us by corrupt governments. A government that oppresses its people is not fighting the people. It is fighting the entire Universe, and can’t win.

While corrupt governments may seem to have absolute power, true power comes from assuming responsibility, not from oppressive power games, and therefore, the power a government has is derived from the people. Open the dialogue amongst the people how they can assume responsibility for the issues that the people are facing and that the government is not. This is the strength of civil society. A global renaissance functions on a higher level than a global genocide.

Yours for peace,


Principal
The World Peace Organization for the One World Government